How scientific is MBTI?

It's not.

Sub-pseudo science tier.

Just take a big 5 test if you want an accurate description of you're personality

File: 1488258478912.jpg (49KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 300x300px

>>8770846
>tell test that you're x
>test tells you that you're x
>omg this is like soo me

>>8770846

It's horoscope for people who aren't into horoscope.

>>8770846

http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf

>>8770846
Glorified Horoscope

>>8770846
From experience it seems to atleast type people accurately whether or not the test itself is valid, the big five is better though

It is useful for self-assessment, given the test is thorough and your answers were accurate

but of course most people are going to give favorable answers in some regards where they're actually lacking

I've gotten INTJ on 3 different tests so I'm going to assume that's where I'm at

>>8770846
yes it is
and most of 4chin is INTP

>>8770846
I've done a lot of reading on it because my girlfriend is super into it, and it seems to be complete bullshit. Harmless, but bullshit. I don't think we can accurately define human personalities into set groups yet.

>>8775165
since you have a girlfriend, nothing you say has any worth here

>>8775186
You're just jealous that I found a girl that lets me suck her cock.

>>8775202
I retract my previous statement and congratulate you sir.
You have fine taste and have a good day.

>>8770985
>>8771135
>>8771155
Hey, at least these personality tests reword and feed your answers back to you instead of just spitting out untailored analysis and advice at random like horoscopes do.

>>8773334
Holy shit why do I always end up as INTJ

>>8773334

ENTP, damn, right on the money.

Hurray for being bit of a cunt!

>>8773334

That chart is entirely too accurate.