I did some independent research these past couple months /sci/.

>>8769270
>Discuss?

You mean disgust.

FTFY

>>8769290
First post worst post.

Congratulations OP.

Pheromones and attraction have been hand in hand for a long time, and it comes as no surprise to me to see your method has produced results.

Here is the question:
Will you take your product to market?

>>8769304
If you want to buy my dick nectar, you certainly can

File: 1435798885314.jpg (30KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 450x450px

>eau de nuts

>>8769304
Except that recent research suggests that "pheromones" don't do anything for humans.

>>8769270
Bad experiment design. Of course you are going to meet more women on the weekends who are looking to hook up. You put your gross scent on at the most opportune part of the week and showered on the least opportune part of the week.

>>8769413
Let's make OP a better experimental design.

One of OP's friends takes the nut sweat bottle and, every day, randomly chooses a treatment regime and either the nut sweat or a suitable control control (plain water? saline?). The friend tells OP the treatment regime but not the identity of the bottle.

Analysis would be some kind of linear regression omdel along the lines of
N ~ I + T + D + e
where N is success at acquiring a phone number for every woman OP flirts with, I is the identity of the liquid, T is the treatment regime, D is the day of the week, and e is random error

It would require a lot more effort but the data would be more convincing.

>>8769426
>>8769413

This is actually very helpful, and kind of part of the reason i came here. I had realized my experiments werent unbiased. Maybe ill do this again and report back?

>>8769270
for a really thorough experiment you should also spray someone else's nut sweat on you and see if that works.

>>8769453
Good idea. Maybe use people of different physical attractiveness?

>>8769270
Waiter, this copy pasta is stale.

>>8769458
yeah. Also, it's possible that you are more confident on the nut sweat days because you know you sprayed it on. Can you have another bottle of plain water that you spray sometimes, without knowing which bottle is which? Like have a friend mix up the two bottles and then tell you which one was which after the experiment.

But then, you could probably tell which one was which just from the smell. So you have to disable your own sense of smell for this

>>8769270
seems inconclusive to me. you need more specific data that you won't be able to get. like their neurological response to: the sight of you, the colors you wear, hair style, who you are with if anyone, what you order to drink ect.
also, what is their state of mind when you approach them? are they desperate, looking for a revenge fuck, being dared to "hook up with you". things like that.


TL;DR - your "independent research" isn't any better than superstition/old wives tales/pseudo science or confirmation bias. sorry if this offends you.

>>8769412
Recent research shows that you're retarded. How do you respond?

>>8769442
Do it! Might just be the ass penny effect.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2n6137

I suddenly just got really hungry for some reason.

File: 1484629124134.jpg (67KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 640x480px

>>8770015
Are you saying i sprayed genital sweat on my face for nothing

>>8769405
Holy shit
My sides

I've done this myself OP/bait
It works for anon fags too FYI

You need to test the following:
>Your eau de nuts
>regular cologne (not Axe, that's homosex)
>combination of both
>negative control (none)
>swap days if the week per combination or negative control
>test where you hook up, such as a gym, bar, sports game, restaurant, etc.

Have your friends do this too with their own. Now, for the really homosex part: swap eau de testes, make sure each person gets another's at least 3 times for surety. See if a certain man's pheremones are more attractive than another, or whose is most detrimental.

Take the following notes:
>Initial reaction
>getting number
>maybe some other parameters I'm not thinking of

Do this over a number of months. Compile data. Post results

>>8770546
I think it would be better to start off with a simpler methodology first before proceeding to something so complex. We need some basic evidence that the effect is real before we start including alternatives like cologne.

you're a brainlet, /thread

File: 3.jpg (194KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1280x800px

>>8770015
>>8770451

you didn‘t really control the environment.. so yes
but social research is bullshit anyway, even done by professionals 30% (...at least) are complete bollocks

>>8770546
this sounds like a Nature paper

>>8769412
You've clearly never been intimate with a female before

File: sci is a magical place.png (42KB, 444x144px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 444x144px

>>8770451
banner when

>>8772140
lol time to post this on /r/4chan :^))))