Consider two brainlets A and B.
> A. He doesn't believe in Evolution
> B. He believes it but doesn't understand how it works and think it's a goal oriented process
Who would you prefer debating / arguing with?
Neither. I would just wait until brainlets die off from natural selection.
i never engage in such pointless arguments
>>8761626
B, because it's easier to correct a misconception than attempt to change the views of a willfully ignorant religious zealot.
I, myself, don't believe in evolution. So A. Wouldn't take long to convince him that I'm right.
>>8761633
Underrated.
Fun fact, evolution cannot explain how life first came to be.
>inb4 memiogenesis
>>8761752
Abiogenesis is not within the scope of evolution.
>>8761626
>>8761626
You can convince someone you're right if their view on the matter isn't completely the opposite of what you're talikng about, but it would make no sense to argue about something so pointless.
>>8761752
Algebra cannot explain how numbers came about.
>I took the bait