What is this?
is it a string?
>>8760163
uwu
>>8760171
Don't answer a question with a question.
>>8760194
but i dont know what it is
>>8760163
It's basically this, OP
>>8760194
Why not?
>>8760210
WHAT ARE YOU POSTING WHAT IS THIS
I DEMAND ANSWERS
>>8760210
Okay I think I get it. Thanks.
>>8760219
Well, technically this
>>8760163
It's a like-like.
It eats your shield if it catches you.
>>8760223
l-lewd
>>8760223
I am a sad old man. I have been browsing r9k since its modern "loser" incarnation, at least since early 2011.
This is the single most elegant and abstract representation of pepe and wojak that I have ever seen.
>>8760223
So what properties do these curves have? How are they modeled?
>>8760236
It's actually quite simple
>>8760238
who are you
WHO ARE YOU
Sorry guys, I have to leave. Here's a last one, hope it answers your questions
>topologists masturbating in this thread
>>8760252
YOUR THIRD DIMENSION ISN'T REAL ANYWAY
This is the best I can do at the moment. I don't know how to do >>8760223 though.
some kind of surface normal
the "equidistant" gives it away
you've got a curve on a surface, and the curve "above" the surface is the curve you get when you translate each point on the curve by the surface normal at that point, by a constant
honestly, i have no idea what purpose this could have
>>8761312
what's going on here, the angles look more out of whack than if they were surface normals
>>8761609
yeah i was wondering if there are any practical applications
>>8760216
:>==8
Not OP, but let me start my own little "guess the maths behind this animation" puzzle. Let's start with a nice one.
>>8761636
Here's a related variant of the previous one.
>>8761642
And here's one worth meditating about.
What are these made with?
>>8761646
This one looks like the Riemann-Zeta function
>>8760163
Topological pepe
>>8761648
You can make all of them in Mathematica
>>8760163
A very rare pepe.
>>8761636
looks like a rotation of the projective plane
>>8760253
There's nothing topologically interesting here
>>8761646
Is it anything to do with this? Where k = 1 / 7 or around there?
>>8762204
Forgot picture.
>>8762189
Taylor series for 'e'?
>>8762223
No, you idiot. Partial sums in the Taylor series for e^x
>>8761646
Here's something similar.
https://alpha.editor.p5js.org/wernstrom/sketches/r173IGWKx
>>8762229
yeah obviously, forgot ^x
>>8762242
So why'd you bother asking?
>>8762273
As in I meant to say '^x', wouldn't made any sense if it was just one constant without anything variable.
Not really part of this thread, but if you like the animations already posted you might like this one.
>>8763993
ouch that sucks :(
imagine being attached to a star that gets flung at high velocity into the darkest depths of space
>>8760163
The normals of a circle projected on a surface.
>>8764011
What is the circle normal to? The flat surface under the warped surface?
>>8763996
that Image is in dozens of millions of years per Frame ... so "high velocity"
>>8764052
it would be cool to be beings that can experience time that fast though right?
>>8760242
It's in the filename, if you couldn't work it out from the first one its time to stop posting