Give me a scientific answer to this?
Is love real?
Well, it certainly is not rational.
>>8753444
As real as chemistry is.
>>8753444
It's as real as any other emotion or feeling. If you ever find yourself doubting that your feelings are real, stab yourself in the hand and try telling yourself
>The pain isn't real, it's just some chemicals in my brain.
>>8753444
No OP, everyone throughout all of history who claimed to experience love was just lying.
>>8753444
The feeling of love is a chemical reaction, but actually understanding and enjoying who a person is that can go along with that emotion has real significance. Sure we're still driven by instinct at its core, but that doesn't invalidate the intimate interpersonal relationship it leads to.
>>8753702
Or in other words, it can be real, depending on how you define it, but you might be doing it wrong.
>>8753458
underrated
>>8753923
>>8753581
>No OP, everyone throughout all of history who claimed to experience love was just lying.
Most people babble lots of stupid and lies. You mistake urges and lust with love. If half marriages end in divorce, the the other half is faking it.
Look at all the people willing to text/drive, kill you and then lie and say, "No, Officer, I wasn't texting driving." Do you believe even one of them loves themselves, their family, me, you? They have only hate.
>>8753444
>Is love real?
There seems to be, degrees of hate for self and others. If there ever be love, there will be peace and sanity, accountability and consequence.
>>8753458
underrated post
>>8753444
Of course it's real, it's a biological construct to induce mating and bonding for a breeding season.
Who really doubts the existence of biological mechanisms to induce the mind into extreme bonding? What you have to doubt and be skeptic is the idealized cultural construct.