stellar evolution, planet formation

>>8739509
yea so it might sound weird, but stars are actually just older/evolved planets that have started shining and gained the majority of the mass and hydrogen.

>>8739515
And people are just planets that didn't get big enough to become spherical.

File: SpaceFlag.png (47KB, 182x132px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 182x132px

>>8739509
Someone who does statistical analysis should analyze the likelihood that one of the oldest stars in the universe is 140cy from Earth.

http://www.space.com/20112-oldest-known-star-universe.html

>>8739635
>oldest known

Is key, the actual oldest star is probably very far away, that one is just the oldest we've seen.

>>8739635
>You know, it's pretty strange that most of the people I know live near me, huh?

>>8739555

That's completely true. I mean....have you SEEN the size of some of these fatties?

>>8739509
your x axis disproves this

File: 300px-San_Xavier_del_Bac_01.jpg (15KB, 300x205px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x205px

>>8739957
the key is that the density of such stars should be so low that any random spherical volume 140cy in radius is highly unlikely to contain such an old star