burn Babby burn

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

File: Towards700.png (244KB, 339x495px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 339x495px

>>8737113
What went wrong in 1965, 1992 and 1999?

So much stupid alarmist propaganda, how about you people educate yourselves a bit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJWq1FeGpCw&index=5&list=PLIBtb_NuIJ1zpyK6kNR-xPfszMD_uDsEU

>>8738808
I despise PragerU. They don't even try to obfuscate the fact that they're owned by a bunch of neocon kikes.
>>8737113
Climate science is actually more complicated than rocket science.

>>8738808
I love how blatantly obvious it is who pays that guy.

>>8738967
No way. The scientists are the ones that are all bought. Politicians are businessmen are not incorruptible and can't be bought!

File: haha.jpg (41KB, 562x437px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 562x437px

>>8738808
>complains about propaganda
>posts propaganda

>>8739444
That is probably just heresy.
"Propaganda" has its etymology in 'propagation of church dogma'. In this dialect it is clear who the purveyor of propaganda really is, the church of man made climate change.

>>8739457
>Propaganda has something to do with the Church
>Man made climate change is a church
Yes, you made it really clear with this brilliant argument whom the purveyor of propaganda is.

By the way, the video fails to convince even the gullible commenters of Youtube, who usually lap up this kind of dishonesty. So it's not even successful propaganda.

>>8738786
>assuming something "went wrong"

>>8739457
>probably
Lrn2probabilly fgt pls

>>8739444
>unable to see sarcasm
The brainlet invasion is real

File: 639good.jpg (13KB, 413x234px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 413x234px

>>8738786
No need to panic, model retrodicts
1965 0.9222 ppm/year
1992 1.6458 ppm/year
1999 1.8334 ppm/year
So the observations must be wrong