Evolution: in Need of an Update?

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
Evolution: in Need of an Update? 2017-03-09 01:31:21 Post No. 8733713
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: F1.large (5).jpg (128KB, 1280x759px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1280x759px

Evolution: in Need of an Update? Anonymous 2017-03-09 01:31:21 Post No. 8733713 [Report]

Is an update to the modern evolutionary synthesis necessary, or is it fine as it is?

Anonymous 2017-03-09 02:21:36 Post No.8733772
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 02:21:36 Post No.8733772 [Report]

>>8733713
Many fields are, even those outside of STEM, law for instance (applying Victorian ideals to the modern world).

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:24:05 Post No.8733990
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:24:05 Post No.8733990 [Report]

>>8733713
>Evo-Devo theory.

Are we not men?

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:31:01 Post No.8734011
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:31:01 Post No.8734011 [Report]

Darwinian Evolution is absurd. It's a chapter of the Materialist-Nihilist model of the World. Lamarckian or even Sheldrakian models are much more sensible, even within the confines of Scientism.

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:33:11 Post No.8734018
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:33:11 Post No.8734018 [Report]

>>8734011

>Lamarckian

I swear to god if you are thinking of mentioning Epigenetics...

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:37:37 Post No.8734023
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:37:37 Post No.8734023 [Report]

>>8734011
>you have to go back
>>>/x/

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:43:40 Post No.8734028
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:43:40 Post No.8734028 [Report]

File: 1408727822211.gif (897KB, 172x162px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 172x162px

>>8734011

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:50:36 Post No.8734037
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:50:36 Post No.8734037 [Report]

>>8734018

...?

Epigenetics is as mainstream as Genetics as this point.

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:51:47 Post No.8734039
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:51:47 Post No.8734039 [Report]

>>8734037

>Epigenetics is Lamarkian

Yeah, and I can shit gold.

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:54:23 Post No.8734044
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 04:54:23 Post No.8734044 [Report]

>>8734039

You're the one who brought it up. There are plenty of other potential underpinnings of Lamarckian models.

Anonymous 2017-03-09 05:08:46 Post No.8734066
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 05:08:46 Post No.8734066 [Report]

>>8733713
Evolution is moved around by genetic engineering right?

Anonymous 2017-03-09 05:26:22 Post No.8734095
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-03-09 05:26:22 Post No.8734095 [Report]

File: discourse.jpg (84KB, 627x456px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 627x456px

>thread about modernizing evolutionary theory in light of new discoveries
>immediately devolves into Lamarckian >>>/x/ fuckery

>>8733990
underrated

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/