Does true randomness exists?

ya
can you predict every next sample of noise on an analogue oscilloscope? no you cant. math is dumb lol

>>8733045
couldn't you just plonk a steady voltage in

>>8733045
wtf is your problem, op asked about true randomness and you're over here talking about prediction???

Why would we have a word for it?

>>8733044
OP's brainwaves.

>>8733044
Yes, your spelling for example.

The concepts of determinism and randomness, and their alleged interplay, make up Scientism's Ontological comedy where everyone refuses to agree on meaningful falsifiable definitions, refuses to ascribe a single experience of object to either of them, refuses to show where one ends and the other begins, and yet claims that the interplay is axiomatic and exclusively explains everything there is to know.

Seinfeld is less absurd at this point.

>>8733044
Randomness is just complexity beyond human capacity for pattern recognition.

no, there is no such thing as randomness it's all perfectly predictable, test me go on, ill tell you anything.

>>8733044
there is if you accept the Copenhagen interpretation.

>>8733044
There is teh penguin of d00m
>>8733456
>a cat can be both dead and alive

>>8733414
noice

>>8733044

no, welcome to physics

that doesn't mean we can predict/measure it all. that's the only functional randomness (our perception, consequent of our limitations)