/Sci/ Humor! YLYL

>>8729784
You're right, that edit is a fucking joke
Everyone knows engineers go between biologists and chemists, and all the best philosophers are mathematicians too

>>8729784
>philosophy isn't logic
>logic isn't the foundation of math
>logic isn't the foundation of computer science
philosophy > math = cs > physicists > chemists > biologists > engineers >>>>>>>>> psychologists > sociologists > political scientists >>>>>>>>>>>> economists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM3gyhb1HGU&ab_channel=SciencephiletheAI
>inb4 reddit

File: cecs.png (45KB, 838x593px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 838x593px

>>8730175
t. physics major

>>8730503
>poli sci above economists

At least economists passed college algebra

>>8730576
who made this shit? we were already at 2 ghz in 2001.

>>8729767
>aluminum is the best metal
>not diamond

brainlet detected

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (45KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1280x720px

How jealous can one be of programmers?

>>8730598
can relate

>>8730593
This runs in theta(1)

>>8729784
And mathematics are applied philosophy
>>8730592
And we have way more than 3.2GHz now, it's not supposed to be high end

>>8730606
pro-gamers? like dota and cs:go?

>>8729784
>mathematics
>a random symbol-based construct
>pure

>>8730847
No, pro-grammers. Linguists

>>8730874
The fuck is a grammer, you libtard?

>>8730598
>not taking into account the differences of speed of walking on the path vs walking on grass

>>8730570

WTF is wrong with education and comunication?

Even Political science has a better standing in all of these charts.

>>8730936
Or the difference in various factors, like air resistance during certain seasons, or the effect of heat or direct sunlight and the resulting lack of fluids... really there are so many variables... please help my autism. :(

reddit - the thread

>>8730574
i'm Muslim, but this to really top kek.
wtf with this kind of people

File: 1486871342265.jpg (103KB, 889x468px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 889x468px

>>8730593
here's more

>>8731134
>>8731137
god I love these

>>8730576
LOL!

File: Untitled.png (1MB, 857x1202px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 857x1202px

>>8730588

File: globalwarming.png (63KB, 523x358px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 523x358px

>>8729745

>>8730580
This isn't funnel. You have to post the one without the text explaining the joke away.

>>8730570
>IQ
>estimated from average GRE scores

LOL

>>8730598
Literally OCPD

File: 1488499659738.jpg (131KB, 548x634px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 548x634px

>>8730593
jesus christ

>>8730593
can someone please explain this to me?

>>8730593
it doesn't even work

>>8731762
It loops through all even numbers to find a match to the input (which would mean it's even). There are multiple simpler ways to do it.

>>8731818
Oh, and on top of that, it doesn't even work because two of the lines are switched.

>>8731023
t. dumbass

>>8731844
>/b

>>8731844
>unironically implying that literally nobody right-of-center can differentiate or integrate
what a joke

/sci/ is a joke now

/sci/ is fucking KILL

might as well rename it /tumblr/

>>8731821
what's funny about it?

>>8731843
>WHAZ IZ JUKE?!
>I NO UNDTSNS!
It is a YLYL thread you fucking mongo.
>t. autistic fuckhead

>>8731868
>using the t meme invented by /gsg/

>>8731844
I'm the third anon in the cap. What's funny about it ?

>>8731872
And what? What're you going to do about it?

>>8731865
It's just funny that it's a ridiculously poor solution to a really simple problem.

>>8731878
obviously i'm going to greentext aggressively at you until you get bored and leave, you memer faggot

File: 1470926757532.gif (277KB, 240x287px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 240x287px

>>8731881
Oh no! Please don't!

>Breaking out the /pol/ memes.

>>8731880
oh lol. that's pretty funny.

>>8731877
>I'm the third anon in the cap. What's funny about it ?
That's the Goldbach conjecture in the first post.
The poster is jokingly implying it can be solved by induction and used as a captcha.
How come nobody gets it?

>>8731923
Didn't know about the Goldbach conjecture
Also he didn't state the sum should involve only two numbers.
I just assumed he was being silly in the proof by induction part was some more retardation, because it just didn't make any sense.

>>8731903
it's also the meme(fact) that people who learn programming only through school(hence the picture of the guy with the degree in his hand) learn bad programming and will not be able to write good code

>>8731863
spotted the poltard

>>8731941
>Also he didn't state the sum should involve only two numbers.
I didn't notice that.

>>8732080
spotted the jew-brainwashed, UCLA-permacucked, rainbow hair gender-psionic, idiot underage millennial kike cuck, /utg/ junta shill, suck big black islamic nigger dick, cuck, degenerate, derelict, cucked in the mouth, cucked in the ass, cucked in the brain, cucked in the genes, raceless mulatto, franco-alaskan nazi thug goon, australian tranny mutant kike, lying degenerate chinese slut whore, fat bald magyar-turk propagandist, finno-mongolian furfag gay anal guinea homo, shill, troll, very rude and disrespectful person. go back to /utg/.

>>8732098
>>8732080
None of you guys are being funny. If you feel the need to insult someone just go on /pol, you'll have plenty of reasons to do so.

>>8732111
go back to /utg/

>>8732080
spotted the SJWtard

damn, i can't believe how jealous /sci/ is of /pol/ about not being the best board on 4chan

>>8730594
>aluminum
>not aluminium

Mega brainlet

>>8731863
I thought there was a joke in there.
Like that the right doesn't know how to integrate.
Get it. Integrate?

Then maybe the left doesn't know how to differentiate? idk I got nothing.

File: 98234765.png (747KB, 857x1202px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 857x1202px

>>8730588
>>8731194

>>8730596
can someone explain?

>>8731253
retarded graph

>>8732222
Fucking this.

>>8730503
>philosophy is logic
>for some reason, philosophers still fail to agree on anything

If it's logic, you should be able to know wether something is true and you should be able to prove stuff and reach some kind of consensus.

I do like philosophy, but you shouldn't call it logic.

>>8730593
Lost hard

>>8732622
Not him, but there is a difference between agreeing on conclusions and agreeing on whether or not the conclusions are consistent with the premises and arguments.

>>8729784

Why does this keep getting reposted? Engineering is one of the least pure fields there is, field purity doesn't mean "how good it is" or "how much money you'll make."

>>8732684
thats the joke autist

>>8732691

That doesn't make any sense as a joke. It's a misunderstanding not a joke.

File: 1453380256560.jpg (411KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1462x1462px

>>8732693
A U T I S T A L E R T

seriously tho take ur meds kiddo

stop being a cuck t. me

for real L MA O

File: 1453511410070.png (334KB, 461x418px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 461x418px

>>8732697
yeah this kid >>8732693 is hella autsismal L O L honestly

>>8732693
jesus youre atustic

>>8732684
>Engineering is one of the least pure fields there is

thats not true. engineers prove hypothesis and conjectures in the most incontrovertible way. they build it. instrumentalism is science's ultimate vindicator and engineer's are the arbiter.

File: 1441536582440.jpg (51KB, 514x536px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 514x536px

>>8732697
>>8732701
>>8732703
>>8732711

buttmad autist samefag

>>8732711

>they build it
>instrumentalism

That's the complete opposite of field purity. Field purity is how abstract the discipline is. Again, you're conflating field purity with quality. Field purity doesn't mean the field is great. It means it's less involved in implementation details and more of an abstract thing in itself. Mathematics is extremely pure because it abstracts away all real world specific details. Engineering is extremely impure because it deals extensively with real world specific details.

Since this isn't a serious thread, I'll ask this here:
What's a brainlet? Explain that meme to me.
I'm worried that I am one. That or I'm just a fuckup. What's the different between a brainlet and a fuckup?

>>8732757

Fuckup implies you did something wrong. Brainlet just means you don't have much capacity for intelligent thought. You can be a brainlet and not fuck things up as long as you stay within an environment suited to your capabilities, like McDonalds.

>>8732741
>Field purity is how abstract the discipline is

i disagree. i would define purity as a field being as self contained as possible, with no outside input from other fields necessary for advancement.

engineering is pure in the sense that it deals only with the real world and actually requires no formalism or rigor in order to perpetuate its advances.

File: purity.png (32KB, 740x308px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 740x308px

>>8732781

>i disagree.

You don't get a choice. It's not a mystery, the meaning of the original comic is very clear. I'm going to quote the explain xkcd article for it here.

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/435:_Purity

>Now, mathematics has the classifications Pure mathematics (the maths you learned in school, and the subject of the field of maths,) and Applied mathematics (physics, chem, and so on.) Taking this to its logical extreme, the comic arranges the six scientific fields according to the Hierarchy of science, represented by a person on a chart of purity, saying that a field is 'more pure', than the fields depending on it.

Pure maths vs. applied maths is an important distinction for understanding what "field purity" means. You would NEVER call accounting pure maths. Accounting deals with actual instances of money in the real world. Pure maths deal with ABSTRACT objects like functions. There is no real world exponential function you can pick up and examine. It's the abstraction of a concept away from the real world instances that participate in it.

Engineering is all about application. You are completely misunderstanding the meaning of "field purity" by trying to see the discipline of practical, real world application as somehow MORE pure than other disciplines.

>>8730598
The hypotenuse will always be shorter

>>8732819
>t. genius

>>8730598
>calculates efficiency to save 1 or 2 seconds
>probably wastes 10x that amount on video games or facebook

>>8730936
this disappointed me too. Also clearly if the travel speed is the same you should travel in a straight line.

>>8732916

Or you could reason that a straight line to your objective (assuming equal terrain on each path) will always be quickest.

The real issue with brainlets is that they math when its a waste of time.

>>8732916
You gotta save up time to properly spend time. It's not a waste if you enjoy it.

>>8732235
That post definitely wasn't making that joke.

>>8730574
Source because I refuse to believe people are this retarded ?

File: 1486482344858.gif (537KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 480x270px

>>8732693

>>8731115
Allahu akbar

>>8733016

Nope, you aren't making a joke by failing to understand what field purity is. The original comic had a joke. You have a misunderstanding.

>>8732819
>not considering hyperbolic space

hope you packed enough camping gear and food to survive the trek across that lawn, bro.

>>8730570
What sophomore did this "estimation" of IQ?

File: memri magnets.jpg (15KB, 229x221px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 229x221px

>>8730574
new reaction face for my collection

>>8729767
Beryllium is the best metal, hands-down.

>>8729745
Already lost.

>>8730598
I do this in my head since I like to race

>>8732235
You made me laugh anon

>>8730175
Everyone knows engineers aren't scientists, more like.

>>8731941
you and people like you are the reason /sci/ is kill.

congrats, ignorant swine.

>>8731844
>not asking whether or not an arbitrary computer program halts
It's like you guys want to have to update your system every time an advancement in AI comes.

>>8732697
>>8732701
>>8732703
>Samefagging

File: graph Correlation-versus-causation-3.gif (23KB, 500x325px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x325px

>>8732424
Then you goan love this one.

>>8733701
I'm not. I'm probably better able at doing math than you are.
I just don't care about math that is way beyong my scope.

If you think it is important, you're probably a brainlet for which it's the only way to show off in society.

>>8732111
>/pol

>>8729767
>>>>aluminium

aluminum sounds so stupid

What's really funny is that not a single fucking post ITT makes me laugh at all. I guess I won then.
This is fucking pathetic. Get your act together, /sci/.

File: 3MdrRdK.png (21KB, 582x105px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 582x105px

>>8734292

File: 1487710931950.jpg (32KB, 544x533px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 544x533px

>>8729745

>>8734364
kek'd

File: 1469094264270.jpg (123KB, 537x536px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 537x536px

>>8734364
Why do they always paint them to look so apathetic when getting wounded, or killed in medieval artwork, even in the HEMA manuals they always look so damn chill?

><- Picture very much related.

File: dude can you not.jpg (280KB, 725x609px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 725x609px

>>8734375
medieval life is suffering

Pure knot topology

File: snail2.jpg (94KB, 800x402px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 800x402px

>>8734375
After the Snail Wars, everything else was a piece of cake.

>>8734284
The discoverer named it Aluminum. Naming rights go to the discoverer, not to some guy who thought the name would be improved by adding a syllable.

File: confirmation bias 3.jpg (278KB, 2657x820px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 2657x820px

This is maybe more /sci/ humor than science humor...

>>8734670
Ethically it doesn't belong to its discoverer; it belongs to the humanity.

Use whatever term best describes the entity.

>>8729745
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkn_bRM1LOQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyD4p8_y8Kw

>>8733635
>balancing stoichiometric equations is like making pizza

my favorite one

>>8734685
Making up shit to defend your crappy name for something you didn't discover. Aluminum doesn't belong to the discoverer -- the right to name it does.

>>8734685
>company discovers new substance
>names it Teflon
>no, you don't have the right to name your discovery. It belongs to humanity!

anon, pls

>>8734364

That's pretty nifty. Made me chuckle sensibly.

>>8734825
> teflon
> not polytetrafluoroethylene
teflon is trademarked and dupont doesn't want you using that name for stuff they don't make

>>8734871
>polytetrafluoroethylene
>not superslidone

>>8731844
nothing is as subtle as this conjecture

>>8734025
At last. I finally understand.

>>8734292
Science isn't actually that funny. Best it can do is an unexpected grin.

>>8729767
Aluminium you stupid fucking yanks. Aluminum is like those underdeveloped 8 year olds saying "pasgetti"

>>8730584
Omfg story of my life. Still I do this. A LOT

>>8734670
Humphry Davy identified the existence of a metal base of alum, which he at first termed alumium and later aluminum.

>>8734364
I'm learning this exact thing in calc 3 right now so this made me feel mighty on top of things

>>8735107
>that file name
kek'd

>>8730592
>>8730831
Meh, he's kinda right, 200Mhz woulda been absolute shit in 2001. Better than 1Mhz woulda been top tier in 1980.

Comic's point still stands though. Creator just wasn't autistic enough to bother with wikipedia.

File: pregnancy graph.jpg (6KB, 318x159px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 318x159px

Guys, don't worry. This problem sorts itself out in time.

>>8735197
just wait till you get a load of Laplace transforms.

>>8735111
Yeah man, obviously. It's following the same no-exceptions standard as tantalium, platinium, and molybdenium.

>>8735246
Brainlet here, explain please.

>>8735279
Are 18 year olds still teens?

>>8735197
what the fuck? That's calc 1 stuff

>>8735292
It is.

>>8734675
That's only funny because of the person who made it.

File: 12968526_528955273941940_1394604846_n.jpg (32KB, 750x623px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 750x623px

>>8735197
>learning derivative of e^x in calc 3

>>8729784
*cough* Philosophy
*cough* Apophenia

>>8735320
The joke
Went through you.

File: 20130929.png (288KB, 684x1800px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 684x1800px

>>8731253
related

>>8735320
>eighteen

>>8735282
just wait till you get a load of Gelfand transforms.

File: niceguy.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>8735295
Sure thing

Being the intellectual superior I am I decided to make a comment about a filename implying there was something more to it. I did this in hopes of luring brainlets like yourself into being confused, but then again anyone would be subject to being confused since what this picture is referring to, Conway's Game of Life, is a fairly sophisticated mathematical game.

>>8736056
>sophisticated
not really, the games rules are quite simple, it's the outcome which can be sophisticated.

>>8735107
lost to this

>>8730574
At least the filthy sand nigger acknowledges that the earth is a globe now.

Slow progress but still progress for the moon worshipers.

>>8734364
Kekd

>>8734364
>using partial derivation on a function with only one variable

>>8734364
I don't get it.

>>8736777
Well, at least you've got these trips to console you. Your life must be hard enough as it is.

>>8730598
just use the texicap metric

>>8732235
lmao i giggled

File: 1fe.png (59KB, 658x662px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 658x662px

>>8730588

>tfw studying engineering and actually have 2.0 GPA

>>8731137

>not knowing what an array is

>>8737033
>wanting to solve this with an array

>>8736777
The derivative of e^x is e^x

>>8737044

how would you solve it?

>>8737057
you could probably avoid that function altogether.

but you don't need to check how many are true. it is enough when one is. so you could do it like
if (a1 || a2 || a3 || ...
return true

or even if (a1 | a2 | a3 | ...

and if for some reason you insist on checking each variable by its own
if (a1 == true)
return true
else if (/a2 == true)
return true ...

>>8737057
var args

>>8737073

I still don't understand why you wouldn't use arrays

literally declaring a1...a12 instead of a[12]

[code]

const int aN = 12;

bool a[aN];

//then just

for(int i = 0; i < aN; i++)
{
if(a[i] == 1)
{
return true;
}
}
return false;


[/code]

seems a lot more compact and portable

>>8737028
Sorry, but this board is for high GPA/high IQ lads only.

Every other science. Minimax, yes.
Physics. No thanks, I'm well enough with only max.

>>8737105
>manually using a for-loop to evaluate a boolean
what the fuck

>>8737046
That's the joke? I was thinking it was more complex than that.

>>8730593
>>8731134
>>8731137
These are written for the keks right?
No way anyone can be this retarded.

>>8737132

as opposed to manually typing everything out?

if the number of input changes all I have to change is one number and my program works perfectly

>>8737135
nigger do you have any idea how expensive that for-loop is

>>8737138

I didn't think we were taking system resources into account here since the topic was about syntax

>>8737140
The topic is never just about syntax. Any retard can have some syntactically "nice" function that actually just runs like a total piece of garbage.

>>8731844
>>8731923
No it isn't. Solution:

4=2+2
6=2+2+2
8=2+2+2+2
.
.
.

>>8737143

Well it's O(n) vs O(1)

so it's O(12) vs O(1) 12 times

I think you're making a bigger deal out of this than it is

but if you think I'm wrong please explain so I can take away some knowledge from this

>>8730593
>"The number is false"
There is no universe in which I could not lose to this

>>8737154
Your input is a1, a2, ..., a12. Not an array. So first you'd have to add them into one. (Or rewrite the code that sets a1, ..., a12. But looking at that snippet, rewriting the code might not be a bad idea.)

By using a loop, you need an additional variable (i). And there are 3 additional steps each loop iteration.
- compare value of i (< aN?)
- look up value of i (for a[i])
- increment i by 1

>>8737144
Probably meant as sum of two primes

>>8737197
The compiler would optimize both methods to the same instructions.

GCC is smarter than both of you put together.

>>8737213
I wrote a kernel and a compiler.

>>8732307
Actually, the meme works the other way around, the normal thing is on top, and as it goes down, it becomes increasingly retarded

File: csmemedegree.png (45KB, 818x423px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 818x423px

fresh OC.

public static byte[] intToSignedByteArray(int number){
byte[] ba= new byte[2];
ba[0]=(byte)number;
ba[1]=(byte)(number>>8);
return ba;
}

>>8737197

you're right

do you recommend any good reading/viewing material on optimization and/or proper program structure?

>>8732995
>>8732997
Kek

>>8737073
>Not
return a1 || a2 || ...;

Brainlet detected

>>8735154
Correct. Then some other fag came along and proposed "aluminium" because he thought it sounded better.

File: ELIrAze.jpg (186KB, 700x669px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 700x669px

>religion higher than physics & astronomy
o i am laffin

>>8732933
Social factors

>>8737371
We were looking for them in the wrong place the whole time.

>>8735197
>calc 3
just wait until you get to calc 6

>>8738295
keke

>>8738319
>in calc 54
>hw is to prove hodge conjecture
>tfw cant even integrate thrice

>>8737105

> if(a[i] ==1)
>not if(a[i])

brainlet detected

>>8737219
The fact that its written in Java is the joke right?

>>8739239

kek

>>8729767
>UHLOOMINUHM
fucking americans holy shit

If I wanted humor, I'd ask you to prove that

[math]n \in \mathbb{N} \implies 12|(n^4 – n^2)[/math]

File: 1481739059251.jpg (48KB, 630x405px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 630x405px

>>8736525
About that...

>>8730593
This is just for keks, right? Someone didn't actually write this did they?

File: 1474251670066.jpg (62KB, 764x402px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 764x402px

>>8737134
>>8740411
>tfw you ask exactly the same question someone else already asked because you didn't read the whole thread
Great minds think alike, right?

File: Sabbath at St. Bernard's.jpg (62KB, 395x363px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 395x363px

>>8734375
They were more blase about death in olden times

File: totallymeme.png (84KB, 818x527px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 818x527px

>>8737219
>>8731137
>>8731134
>>8730593
fixed those for you

>>8734375
Medieval people had a sense of humor too, anon. See: Chaucer

>>8740422
Nice dubs

>>8736777
you may be autistic. consult a doctor

>>8730584
This is so true

>>8730503
>math = cs
lost

>>8730910
A term for "a gram of hashish, the resin from the cannabis plant". That's one advantage humanities has over STEM, no real loss of ability to study or work in your field with pot use.

>inb4 degenerate
lel, wat u str8 edge now brah?

File: 1465722025462.jpg (122KB, 728x391px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 728x391px

>>8732819

>>8732992
unless you also change your daily cycle to accomodate for maybe a minute of "saved time" your "time available" is reset every day. Seconds saved only matters on high-volume, consistent production applications like warehouses or work situations. fifteen seconds less walk time equates to a slightly longer time to brush your teeth or wait for a kettle to boil.

Average /pol/ tard

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxeqqo8aNaA

>>8735279
using the line graph threw me off for a second

>>8737206
It didn't say so.

File: 1304263045403.jpg (58KB, 325x325px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 325x325px

I haven't been to /sci/ for a long time. Tell me, are engineers still faggots?

>>8737197
It doesn't matter whether your n booleans are in an array or not. The runtime will be the same and it's also going to be negligible. Typing all those variables out one at a time is both ugly and annoying to change later.

>>8734375
After the black plague nearly wiped out the entire human race, I guess nothing could compare for quite some time. Also I think that's just medieval style of dark humor.

>>8741993
Yes. Always and forever

File: I think not.png (25KB, 948x358px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 948x358px

>>8731253

>>8735197
lost

>>8739401
[math] n^4-n^2=n^2(n-1)(n+1)[/math]

exactly one of n-1, n, or n+1 must be divisible by three (since they're 3 consecutive numbers). if 3|n, then n-1 and n+1 are both even, so 4|(n-1)(n+1). if 3|n-1, or 3|n+1, then n is even, so 4|n^2.

File: 1304261562368.jpg (74KB, 270x360px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 270x360px

>>8742615
good to know

>>8742741
Not bad, though your proof is wrong

>>8742741
>>8742789
The first part is correct, 3 divides either n, n-1 or n+1, but if 3 divides n, that does not imply n is odd (e.g. n=6). Still, either n is even (which implies 4|n^2) or n-1 and n+1 are even, so the 4 still divides the product

Let me reformulate my original post:

If I wanted humor, I'd ask you to prove by induction that

[math]n∈N⟹12|(n^4–n^2)[/math]

>>8730580
>Reimann
>ei

>>8730936
You can only say this because you haven't actually solved the problem.
The solution is always to either go around or go in a straight line to it.

>>8737134
I've seen Pajeet code similar to this.

>>8730593
But that's an infinite loop, anon.

>>8737206
someone who only probably means stuff should not touch math ever again, taking up swineherding instead.

>>8731877
nothing funny about too many people on 4chan these days

>>8737073
>>8737105
>>8737117

Are you lads fucking joking?

>myVal = foldr (||) False myBools

I guess not everyone is as clever as me...

>>8739223
>Using a language that evaluates 0 to False and anything else to True
It's like you want type errors everywhere in your program

>>8730594
So that's why they make engine blocks (etc) out of diamonds...

>>8729767

I want to kickstomp aluminums ass

>>8733334
>toxic
>only use is in missle gyroscopes
>good metal
I bet you like thallium

>>8730576
would you write a GUI to tar all files with pattern 'xyz' exactly two subdirectories below your current directory path? I sure don't.

just execute:

tar -cf archive.tar ./*/*xyz*

There are so many other reasons why a terminal is mandatory without fucking build some windows with buttons first.

Philosophy majors are literally just pre-law though., even a TTT lawyer will make more money and get more pussy than a PhD in your shit STEM field.

>>8730936
Unless the grass is muddy, it should be a negligible difference in speed.

>>8744083
It's a boolean

File: Unknown Armies Plot Hooks.png (266KB, 538x691px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 538x691px

>>8731253
>>8742648

>>8742902
oh shit, that's embarrassing. let me try to redeem myself: since n^4-n^2 is an even function of n, it suffices to prove that 12|n^4-n^2 for any natural number n. the base case n=0 is obvious.

[math] (n+1)^4-(n+1)^2-n^4-n^2=4n(n+1)(n-1)+6n(n+1)[/math]

12| 4n(n+1)(n-1) because 3 divides one of n-1, n, n+1, and 12| 6n(n+1) because n or n+1 is even

>>8745240
typo: left hand side of equation should be (n+1)^4-(n+1)^2-(n^4-n^2)

File: Screenshot_2017-03-14-09-37-30-212.jpg (81KB, 1919x208px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1919x208px

"""""""OC"""""""

>>8744842
>Those smoothed graphs with that few data
disgusting

>>8744842
I could look at these correlation graphs for hours

>>8741251
kill yourself you gay anal homo guinea millennial jew cuck. go back to /utg/.

>>8742743
>>8742615
>>8741993
>hahaha i posted le epic MEEM xDDDD we did it reddit xddddd
Fuck off back to /utg/, you degenerate jew-brainwashed millennial cuckold and shill kike. Kill yourself. Kill yourself. Kill yourself.

>>8745547
>screencapping your own degenerate /utg/-tier anal homo millennial shitposting
Kill yourself. Fuck off back to /utg/. Kill yourself. Jew kike.

>>8736683
kek

>>8732622

Philosophy is very broad. And logic is most certainly an area encompassed, utilized, manipulated, and scrutinized by philosophy. The scientific method is itself an application of epistemology.

Formal logic within philosophy is intensely rigorous. And while it varies from school to school typically formal logic classes within the philosophy department are comperable to logic classes within the math department. Saying that philosophy is not logic is a bit like saying physics isn't math. Sure they aren't technically the same thing, but it's difficult to say anything of use about the former without the latter.

This often gets quite complex and recursive within philosophy due to philosophy analyzing the same logic used to analyze it so it's not quite a fair comparison, but I think you get the point.

>>8730598

>no brachistochrone.

dropped.

File: 1465194000543.jpg (69KB, 652x496px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 652x496px

Disprove this

File: 123.jpg (79KB, 842x595px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 842x595px

>>8730570
*

>>8735323
that's the joke you fucking dumdum

>>8735197
The good stuff only picks up in calc 8

>>8744663
wow, you're absolutely right anon. I can't believe I never thought of that way before. I'm so glad you chose to enlighten me on the tar files. That's so interesting

>>8746375
Well the rocket would want to stay pointed straight up right?

>>8746375
The equation is simply based off of assumptions, but holds true. When you use conservation of energy:
E_0 = E_F
U_0 + K_0 = U_F + K_F
You have zero kinetic and assume to have zero potential.
(Gm_1m_2)/R^2 = 1/2 mv^2
And solve for velocity

>>8735197
Between this and the replies I lold fuckin hard

File: infinitesequence.webm (3MB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 853x480px

>>8730580
Stop right there!

File: extrapolating.jpg (27KB, 461x295px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 461x295px

>>8735914

>>8737134
this one >>8731137 was written by a colleague at work who wont accept any criticism about his code and always boasts about how good a programmer he is.

>>8737033
>>8737044
>>8737057
>>8737073
>>8737105
>>8739223
>>8744083
this is in C#, so true != 1, and if you want nice syntax at the cost of a bit of performance, and you have the array bool[] a and then use LINQ, then its just a.Any().
(if you balive LINQ gives performance penalties in all cases).

>>8744101
they actually make cars out of diamond for research purposes

>>8746372
Is the joke that 0 is supposed to be a divisor, or that it is arbitrarily generated?

>>8730576
To be fair, in terms of work output. Using a terminal is far more efficient, it's slower to click through conflated menus than to write 1-2 short commands, which you can do within a couple of seconds.

I know it's a comedic comic strip but yeah.

>>8732781
>i disagree
nigga you don't get to disagree with a concise definition lol

>>8735279
it would be a piece wise type of graph not a line

>>8730596
I really hate this. Fucking topologists are even trying to ruin programming with fucking homotopy type theory.

>>8731115
Islam kills fags and apostates.

>>8744842
Number 2 makes sense though. Consumption of margarine and divorce rates probably heavily depend on the state of the economy at the time.

>>8747923
It must be pain to work in that office.

>>8732711
>engineers prove hypothesis and conjectures in the most incontrovertible way
>you'll never be this retrded
feels good

File: 1465082352854.jpg (51KB, 400x323px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 400x323px

>>8732781
>engineering is pure in the sense that it deals only with the real world and actually requires no formalism or rigor in order to perpetuate its advances
>requires no formalism or rigor in order to perpetuate its advances

>>8746375
escape velocity doesn't need to be obtained instantly to leave the fucking floor

i don't need to hit super sonic speeds to jump but if that jump is going to bring me fast and far enough to escape the earth's gravitational pull entirely then yes i better not have skipped leg day

>>8746371
>>no brachistochrone.
Is this what happens when brainlets watch science videos on youtube? Please stop being retarded.

File: nervous.jpg (42KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x500px

>>8746372

>0 as a divisor

>>8731863
still better than what /lit/ has become.

>>8735107
amazing

>>8749259
if you make something that works and gets the job done, it works, whether you designed it in CAD and built it in your garage or followed all the corporate processes and protocols

>>8746441
I want you to reflect on this in an hour and realize how colossally incorrect you are

>>8749487
and which one of these does not involve formalism and rigor?

... oh, you think formalism only refers to corporate policies? mandatory syntax of numeric data entered in a dialog is formalism, too.

what lack of formalism meant in this context is what many people think engineering is really about: tinker blindly with it until it works. that's because most people cannot conceptualize how many orders of magnitude lie e.g. between the complexity of a good pair of scissors and that of an iPad. they think processor architectures are discovered accidentally by tinkering. no joke, I've met many such people.

>>8729745
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=388BSaIonLU

>>8744404
>toxic
S-so?
>only use is in missle gyroscopes
Gyroscopes/IMUs are amongst the few applications which merit using a metal as rare and costly as beryllium, but that doesn't mean beryllium wouldn't be kickass for a wide range of other applications were it more widely available.
>good metal
It's damn good.
>Significantly lighter than aluminum
>Stiffer and stronger than iron
>More conductive pound-for-pound than any other metal
>Low thermal expansion to boot
>Ideal neutron reflector
>Effective neutron moderator
>Transparent to X-rays
>A tiny percentage of beryllium turns soft copper into the strongest nonferrous alloy in existence
>In mineral form, makes trippy gems like emerald and aquamarine
Beryllium is the shit.

>>8737134

I work as a consultant so I'm regularly thrust in front of new code bases.

Basically read this stuff you think could only ever exist for keks, then picture it written in VBA in a fucking Microsoft Access macro, then picture it as the backend for a website that accepts credit cards and stores them complete with CCV.

Then think about the developer that "deploys code updates" by dragging + dropping updated Access databases from his desktop to a passwordless Samba shares accessible on the Internet.

You wouldn't fucking believe the code that comes out of offshore development.

>>8734025

Just showed this to my wife, who confirmed it's legit.

Most lemons from Mexico are bundled with Tequila, and more of that means more drinking and driving. This correlation is actually accepted.

>>8749766
then why do the traffic fatalities fall as the imports increase?

>>8747295

is wildberger a chuuni?

File: 1483718392045.jpg (52KB, 1200x630px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1200x630px

>>8748128
Your autism is the joke

>>8749411

that's the joke.

>>8750151
I think the implication of that webm is that he's the only one who isn't.

>>8730580
why do you keep posting this shit one with all the text explaining the joke

>>8747295
H E H

>>8749766
Retard

File: images (20).jpg (8KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 226x223px

>>8730593
lost
ill try to make a similar meme when i have some free time

>>8749513
It's not that wrong

>>8730570
>No error bars

Mathematician must have done the analysis.

>>8732995
What branch of math (physics?) is this?

File: hierarchy.png (22KB, 394x407px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 394x407px

>>8751422
Set theory famalam.