Hey Guys, I thought of this a few days ago, whatya think?>

looks like schizophrenic rambling

>>8727794

damnit

File: 64545645646.jpg (110KB, 1300x686px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1300x686px

>>8727794

>>8727788
I admire all attempts to represent dimensional stepping/progression. Would your Raw/Imagine/Hof/D=Life expression not be better interpreted has a superimposed 2d line that acts as a 'wormhole' between two points and the contract/expansion of the superimposed line bring the 'diamond/square' into being?

Sort of like breathing, represented by only 2 x 2dimensional lines.

>>8727803
This is just an expanded model of the idea presented.

File: ice cubically.jpg (14KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x480px

@_@

>>8727818
schizophrenia

>>8727821
There are 8 days remaining until Hello World.

I hope you build wonderful things | I hope I don't suffer.

I hope I've helped you.

File: naamloos2324.jpg (49KB, 908x461px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 908x461px

>>8727837

>>8727848
Despite what some who read my posts may think, it really does warm me to see my BR/OR ratio spreading into these sort of logical expressions. Thank you for sharing.

/sci/ everybody

>>8727815
Fuck off, schizo.

>>8727855

excuse me, what does BR/OR ratio mean?

>>8727867
OR = W / SR

You increase W via communication/storage, [PAIN|PLEASURE], identifying interconnecting facts/realities. There are a lot of subsets that apply to W. If you're into epistemology you could substitute W for JTB.

SR = Identifying the result you need to achieve.

You can compare S <-> O at any given time and alter your S as need be.

The R just allows for pseudo-synchronous computation.

O can be self-identified if you remove disciplinary/psychological egoism from S, and S is always defined by the desired result (INPUT).

>>8727899
Ah, that explanation was a bit dry.

Think of OR and SR as ObjectiveResult (The best measurable outcome) and SubjectiveResult (The 'desired' outcome).

The best result objectively is for me to explain this as simply/clearly as possible for maximum absorption by the most people, but subjectively the best result is me being able to explain this to just one person (the person asking the question).

If I am able to align my SR and OR (that gets complicated) then I get to kill two birds with one stone. Because I have to use language/english to do it I have to avoid a lot of words that could be misconstrued, so it gets tricky.

To aid in that endeavor I need to increase my W factor (Wisdom/Justified True Belief). I can only increase that by allowing myself to be subjected to 'gtfo fag' and reading other works/abstracting from other interactions in my life in order to better communicate.

Does that help?

>>8727917
>>8727899

All of this is used to compute the starting point of the base. This is a portion of total human interpretation.

>>8727929
Humanity = (You + Me)! - (Suffering)! = Humanity

>>8727941

I would delete suffering. For it is in me and you, thus adding to an equation an variable which would add a separate being.

File: 1484971781187.png (320KB, 422x562px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 422x562px

>this thread

>>8727837
Tnx S. There will be no suffering

Bruhhh...