>centrifugal force
You do realize that is a very valid fictitious force in regards to non-inertial frames of reference, right? You have taken even a basic classical mechanics class, right? You are not just some freshman/high school Gen ed student who just learned about rotating bodies, right? Come on.
>>8726979
But it's hard to compute. Why can't they make the equation more easier?
>>8726668
>Centrafrugle force
Because it is non-inertial. In a rotating frame, you have to account for other fictitious forces. The universe can't just make its laws "easier" for your convenience, you just have to break it down to a level you can understand and go from there
John Taylor breaks it down pretty well in his Classical Mechanics book
>centripfugtal force
>>8726668
Am about to get a degree in physics and even I don't know the difference between centrifugal and centripital forces. All I know is what happens.
>>8727349
fuck dude
>>8726987
Centrifrugal Force
>>8726668
>Cenartfugil force