Will we ever have cold fusion /sci/?

Maybe, but it is unlikely

We'll have fusion power plants eventually, but not cold fusion. The electromagnetic force makes atomic nuclei repel each other unless you get them close enough for the nuclear forces to overpower it. You do this by putting them under intense heat and pressure so they fly together really fast. Cold fusion requires somehow turning off the electromagnetic force; which you can't do.

>>8723604
No its a meme

>>8723604
What happened to Rossi anyway?

You ivory tower cucks, who here has seen an atom?

>>8723631
Unless you come up with a way to make the strong nuclear force stronger at longer ranges. But this is also currently impossible.

>>8723722
me

File: 220px-Cold_fusion_electrolysis.svg.png (12KB, 220x224px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 220x224px

Didn't the early experiments show neutron production and anomalous heat? There observations were repeated in a large number of labs.

What are the alternative explanations for these phenomena?

>>8723722
I see lots of them every day

>>8723604
I'm not sure if it's exactly cold fusion, but there was some recent effort of using lasers to get deutrium/tritium to fuse without having sun level heat to kick it off. So far it's close but no cigar, but might have promise down the road.

>>8723812
>deutrium