Would we be able to send data into the past? Specifically, memories?

>>8723053
Have you considered the fact that the concept of past is meaningless in physics?
Even the concept of time itself is going to have less value as time goes (pun intended) and research shows that time is linked to quantum-gravity, you can think about it as the amount of the vibrations of small particles, this explains the relation between space-time in some manner.
Also, our world is thermodynamical by definition, so the process of time, even if it was something which worths time (pun intended), would be irreversible.

>>8723155
Have you considered the fact that you are an idiot who needs to stop spouting pop pseudoscience?

>>8723155
So it would be meaningless to alter a thought with the power of very subtle suggestion? As in if said subject saw said message, they would disregard it and continue as if the message never mattered?

File: 400px-Real-and-imaginary-time-axes.svg.png (7KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 400x400px

>>8723166
Have fun calculating imaginary time with Stephen Hawking. Do you really think you can invert time?

>>8723170
What's the link with your first question:
"> Would we be able to send data into the past? Specifically, memories?"?

>>8723200
If our memories were sent to an earlier version of yourself, implying we would recall them as vague as a dream. That or a message that could be relayed to a specified address. Something involving reading brainwaves. (cognitive/neurosci)
Not to sound absurd but given the subject we're beyond that.

>>8723220
>>8723053