Statistics

>>8715795
Well try exponential

>>8715795
You've got heteroskedacity

Take out outliers and keep influential data points?
Unless you crop up the y axis, your data does not seem to have much correlation/relation.
Calculate the correlation coefficient and you can see how strong that relationship is.
I can assume you have the raw data right?

how about sounding less like a sperg u tryhard loser lmoa :^)

idk what "the literature" in your field is but you could like not use linear regression, make a log transform or be better at collecting data, pick one

I cannot take the outliers out and yes I have the raw data. I tried log and exp but did not work out either. I am only familiar with ols and logit, but I have no clue for further processing

>>8715837
echoing this sentiment. your data seems to have different populations within it.

yes they are 3 different products. the problem is only if the linar relation is strong enough and I dont think so. Sadly, I cannot figur out a transformation.
But thanks to any advice from you guys

>>8715795
>The results are contrary to the scientific literature
That's good enough anon, economy is not a science after all.

OP you'd probably perform better at whatever it is you're doing if you could SPEAK FUCKING ENGLISH

that´s probably true :-)

For the first two, try recoding both variables as their logs, sometimes that can make nonlinear relationships linear

As for the last one, I'm not sure how you can fix that shit

Where exactly is the problem? If the data doesn't fit the previous literature, it just doesn't.

Present your findings, say that previous research has different conclusions, talk about your methodological limitations (sampling problems, bias etc.). There is no problem if you manage your results right.

That being said, your second graph looks like it has a curve-like relationship. Try nonlinear regression models, might help.

try using a linear mixed model that has an estimator incorporating shrinkage

>>8715795
what's your end goal? Is it to illustrate the relationship between these two variables or to produce a graph that looks like a figure in a textbook on linear regression?

>>8715795

those labels make me angry.
you can fit a linear model to EVERYTHING the RMS-Error can be huge though.
did you expect the "relative price difference" to rise in your attributes? if so your data might just be shit or different to the data in the "literature".

also try taking absolute values of relative differences

stop using OLS

>>8717445
or if you insist on using least squares, transform the X's so they have a linear relationship with the Y. People have said heteroskedasticity might be happening, however if you are only willing to use OLS you can't really do anything about that. If you do want to tackle the potential heteroskedasticity you'll have to generate wieghts by regressing your residuals against your predictors, and use those weights to re-estimate the regression (google weighted least squares).

>>8717465
This guy right here. This is the guy.

>>8715795
This might be a good resource for correcting the issue with your data. I've used this SPSS code before.

https://www.docdroid.net/B1kZTpJ/heteroscedasticity-testing-and-correcting-in-spss.pdf.html

If all you're concerned about is whether there is a relationship and aren't specifically concerned about specific parameter estimates you could try ranking data and then doing regression.

File: 1470904645625.jpg (261KB, 1057x1200px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1057x1200px

>>8719050
>SPSS

File: IMG_1790.png (188KB, 700x674px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 700x674px

>>8719281
I've actually learned how to do extensive coding in SPSS