So there are different learning types
>Visual
>Aural
>Verbal
>Physical
>Logical
>Social
>Solitary
Now dont some have advantage over others?
Say we are in school and there are 2 studnets michal and tim, now michael has to write down what he heard and go over it again at home to recall but tim on the other hand remembers everything from what he heard. Tim won life
>>8715409
fuck. tim.
These aren't learning types, but types of intelligence.
>>8715710
Btw, if they are types of learning, what exactly is the "aural" type?
>>8715409
Man i love being tim
>>8715711
They learn by listening
>>8715409
Learning types are just about as scientific as phrenology.
>>8715409
Either you learn something or you don't.
This "different kinds of learning" bullshit was thought up by someone to make an autistic football jock think he is "special" because he can throw an inflated piece of rubber even though he cant do basic arithmetic even if his life depended on it.
And for "Sally" to feel "special" about how she can draw pretty pictures even though she can't remember how to get home from school.
oh you're kinda retarded Billy, don't feel sad, you have nose picking intelligence that makes you just as good at life as the kids who actually learn things.
>>8715409
No way fag.
The real classification is more like this:
Visual
Aural
Kinesthetic
Introspective
Emotional
Interpersonal
Linguistic
Logical
Mathematical
Analytic/Critical
Spiritual
Synthetic/Creative
Theoretical
Economical
Practical
By this classification any retard can identify with at least one learning type/intelligence type and claim to be superior to others because of it.
Your list and you are small time.
The only people I ever hear talk about the 'types of intelligence' are liberal arts teachers and students and it is usually brought up in regards to them flunking a math or science course.
>>8716008
Unfortunately, there are also lots of pedagogists and school reformers pushing this bullshit