Daily reminder that minor attraction is normal and biologically

>>8713171
no it isn't, you're a disgusting piece of shit. kill yourself, do it.

That's entirely wrong and promoted by patriarchal societies as a way to control women from early age.

>>8713171
If you don't consider women to have any value as a person, sure.

>>8713171
>banjo playing in the background

>>8713171
>Average prehistoric age of pregnancy
>It's around the age of consent in most western countries

Good showing, senpai.

>>8713193
t. Women

>>8713171
How is reproductive value at age zero anything but zero? I call schenanigans

>>8713389

A newborn girl has a non-zero probability of surviving to reproductive age and then having offspring.

>>8713171
There are very healthy and intelligent kids who's mothers were verge of menopause upon birthing.
That graph isn't reliable or valid.

Those pedophilia propagandists are the real cockroaches I tell you.

>>8713409
Fine but that plot is still bullshit then. It wouldn't increase linearly. It would spike up around age 1 because the risk of infant fatality has fallen. After that risk of not surviving to childbearing age is relatively low.

>>8713171
http://www.bandolier.org.uk/booth/Risk/dyingage.html

Look, the probability of dying under age 1 is ~1/200 but the probability of dying for ages 1-4 is 1 in 4000. By your reasoning reproductive value of a 1 year old should be 20 times higher than the reproductive value of a zero year old.

>>8713417
>then
It would be still. In what units
is "reproductive value" measured? Scarlett Johanssons?

>>8713427
>is "reproductive value" measured? Scarlett Johanssons?
that's my point. that plot has no units, no basis in science. It is just some bullshit made up by a pedophile to justify his degeneracy. Fucking meaningless

>>8713171
even if there is rock hard evidence that pedophilia is biologically sound i doubt it will ever become socially acceptable anytime soon

>>8713171
What the fuck is reproductive value? How do you quantify that? And who made that fucking graph.

File: 1349048622130.png (49KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x530px

>>8713412
Mmmh.

>>8713461
protip: your graph shows the probability of asd increasing from 0.8% to 1.5% hardly a major concern

t. autistic enough to know how to read plots

>>8713463
you're aware that that is a range of near-doubling?

>>8713507
>implying near doubling of a small value isn't a small value

And in fairness, that is just one disease. Young mothers are at risk for many things that older mothers are not.

>>8713409
Literally bullshit.

Axes are asymmetrical. Zero is for the vertical axis. Fuck off.

>>8713193
>promoted by patriarchal societies
a.k.a. every successful society ever
>way to control women from early age.
a.k.a. the only way to run a successful society

>>8713412
Do you understand the concept of statistical expectation? Why does every science funboy instantly revert to something akin to a climate change denier the moment he encounters something that disagrees with his personal politics?

>>8713523
>Axes are asymmetrical. Zero is for the vertical axis.
How are you on /sci/ and not capable of reading a graph? Zero is for both axes. Look at the space between the tick marks, retard.

>>8713193
but patriarchal societies are highly advanced compare to matriarchal primitive shitholes. also women begin to have sex as early as thirteen in matriarchal societies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosuo

>>8713171
this is why we unironically need /pol/

>>8713327
>banjo
try a nasheed senpai

>>8713439
>that plot has no units
But it has numerical values on its y-axis. I wonder what they stand for.

>>8713626
the integral of the curve is degeneracy, so the units are dDegeneracy/dAge

>>8713171
reminder that your tight little white ass is going to be pounded by BBC in federal prison podesta.