Only for genius??
-13
3-3x6+2=?
3-18+2=?
-15+2=?
-13=?
I'm changing the ?? to ?^2. Taking the derivative of that i get 0 = 2?, so
Ans ?=0
>>8709628
1, implied multiplication has higher priority than division.
>>8709639
confirmed for genius x^D^DD^d
>>8709656
thanks friend, be sure to save the screen cap as a .png
3-3x6+2
3-18+2
3-20
-17
>>8709674
Isn't this technically right?
BEDMAS doesn't care about the order you do subtraction and addition.
>>8709674
Since when would -18 + 2 = -20?
>>8709682
3-(18+2)
>>8709686
Now distribute the negative
>>8709694
3-(20)
3-20
>>8709680
It does, left to right
>>8709696
You're being retarded on purpose aren't you
>>8709702
Then why does the order of multiplication or division not matter?
a*b*c = ac*b
>>8709710
6/7/9 != 9/7/6 != 6/(7/9)
6*7*9 == 9*7*6 == 6*(7*9)
Try it yourself
Math rules are important. Answer is -13. No debate.
>>8709725
Right ok.
When your working with addition or multiplcation order doesn't matter, but when it comes to division or subtraction it has to be left to right.
>>8709732
Think of it like adding negative numbers together instead of subtracting. You just need to keep tract of the negatives.
>>8709725
If I multiple it by there reciprocals can I then swap the orders?
-1/12
>>8709741
>>8709617
-13
3-3x6+2
0x6+2
0+2
+2
2
>>8709642
no you do it in order from left to right fucktard. its 9.
>>8709783
Again, implicit multiplication has higher priority than a division symbol this is quite simple mate.
>>8709773
3-3x6+2
0x6+2
0x8
0
CHECKMATE AHTIESTS
3-(3x6)+2
3-18+2
3-18 = -15
-15+2 = -13
that just has to be a trick question
x = 5/18
>>8709674
Do they really teach burgers that addition is distinct and comes before subtraction?
>>8709624
fpbp
>>8709617
3-3 = 0
6+2=8
0x8 = 0
>>8709725
>!=
stop doing that you code monkey
! is factorial
[math] \neq [/math]
>>8709617
3 - 3 = 0
0 x 6 = 0
0 + 2 = 2
Answer is 2.
You're all so fucking retarded I swear to GOD mate.
>>8709642
the amount of people on this board that can't do math at a fifth grade level is disturbing
I'm sorry but I can't sovle that because the cross product of two scalars is undefined, BITCH
>>8710403
Ascii is good enough until input recognition is solved. Markup languages are retarded.
>>8709617
-17
Check it
>>8709680
True but -18+2 is not -20
1)- x +
2
2)- + x
0
3)+ x -
-21
4)+ - x
0
5)x + -
-17
6)x - +
-13
None of the answers are 2 symbols long, therefore no solution exists.
>>8709617
3x6=333333
333333+2=3333332
3-3333332=-3333329