What if he lived longer?
>>8707877
>>8707877
he would be an old man
0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ... = 1
>>8707877
We would have more numberphile videos on why 5687347922378933 is a special number
He'd work on a universal proof of pooing in loo.
>>8710504
unironically neck yourself
>>8711205
Come on, that was pretty funny.
>>8707877
he would die older
>>8707877
Riemann hypothesis would have been solved.
>>8707877
Better question. What if Galois didn't die duelling?
>>8707877
He would find the final solution
>>8707877
He would complete post-anabelian froeboid geometrics
>>8711547
less brainpower than ramanujan t.b.h
what if euler died early?
>>8712652
nothing, he was a brainlet
>>8707877
Nothing, he wasn't brilliant mathematician like Galois, Grothendieck or Memezuki, he just made up couple of gimmicky formulae and nowadays would be pretty much Neil degrade Tyson of maths
>>8713128
>he just made up couple of gimmicky formulae
>>8713128
this
>>8711524
rofl
this guy couldn't carry out a proof for shit
he just adopted the easy-peasy physicist point of view where everything has to converge (which resulted in a lot of wrong results)
also a majority of his results were gotten through empirical means, that's why we never get to see the "proofs", and that also explains his maths goddess bullshit.
tl;dr he was a brainlet.
>find difficult function
>differentiate
>get another difficult function
>bamboozle ppl into thinking ur a maths god xd
I'm pretty sure I could have beaten his ass in a battle of minds by the time I finished classes prépa and integrated ens ulm (people there are gods)
>>8713668
>tl;dr he was a brainlet.
t. brainlet
>>8710504
1+ S= 1+ (1-1+1-1+1-...)
1+ (1-1+1-1+1-....)= S
therefore:
1+ S= S
1= S- S
1= 0
Whats my obvious mistake?
>>8713763
1+ [(1-1)+1-1+1-1+1...] = either 1 or 2 depending on where you stop so not S....
>>8713128
This is bait but still.
>>8713128
No, he would be like rayman - an interesting quirk, but someone without any imagination to create.