is this accurate?

>>8701285
>calculus
this isn't a field of math
>analysis
ok
>complex analysis
this would be included in "analysis"
>number theory
ok
>algebraic geometry
ok
>foundations of mathematics
autistic nonsense
>category theory
slightly less autistic nonsense that has applications to other parts of math
>...
bs
>dubs theory
trash
>wildburguer theory
trash

its one of those things people who dont actually study math but know the names of different fields of math make

>>8701323
yeah, some aspects of analysis are arguably more complex than category theory. To put it in perspective, the Riemann hypothesis is technically analysis.

>>8701327
>the Riemann hypothesis is technically analysis

It is as much a problem in number theory. And by the time it is proven, it will likely be a part of some not yet developed theory. Like IUTT.

>>8701327
they are only more complex on an introductory level, which means nothing. there are always unsolved questions

>>8701329
IUTT is not a branch of math. it is a set of arithmetic geometry theorems

>>8701293
So 100% correct then?

Nice

>>8701342
Technically yes. But the difference is like that of studying Schemes and studying the solution sets of real-valued polynomials.

I really do not like this meme.

was waiting for
>Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory

>>8701285
Wilderburger theory isn't even a theory, it's just finitism, and he actually is semi-legit even if he's annoying.

>>8701285
What's the best way to learn math from scratch?

File: bogs enlightened.jpg (181KB, 1468x976px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1468x976px

>>8701285
Post-anabelian froeboid geometrics

File: levels of algebra.png (743KB, 360x1482px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 360x1482px

>>8701285

>>8701293

>category theory
>less autistic than X

wow, you are a bitch ass fag niggo, aren't you?

File: categoru.png (594KB, 479x1482px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 479x1482px

>>8701618
bitch ass nigga only pleb-ass fucks and analysts never use category theory

>>8701285
no.