Duoettertium!

>>8696324
I don't speak Latin

>>8696332

But that is a step in the right direction.

>>8696324
Homus Sapiens

>>8696430

That is a step in the wrong direction.

two something
Two girls?
A duo of girls?

I'm assuming the picture was chosen for that reason

File: 23.png (1KB, 85x85px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 85x85px

>>8696324

>>8696570
Getting closer, but people already knew about that one.

>>8696995
Is it a new element or an existing one?

>>8696995
Ok, then 203 (et for zero).

>>8697028

Oops, getting colder.

>>8696324
127

>>8696324
deuterium

File: 1487783867241.jpg (79KB, 634x566px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 634x566px

>>8697109
Well? Was I right OP?

>>8697109

Afraid not. Think about the quarks.

File: doduoterium 2.jpg (175KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1024x768px

>>8696324
I think I got it.

>>8696324
This is an +18 website, Honoka. Get out.

Dog Latin (two and a third) points to proton or neutron.

>>8697715

Very close. 2 1/3 is correct.

>>8697729
In proper Latin, 2 1/3 would be called duo et tertiarium. Tertium means 'a third', as in tertium non datur (no third option). If memory serves..

>>8697715

I think I'm going to call it solved here. There are hypothetical particles that can have +1/3 or +4/3 charge. If you could put one of these in the nucleus of the atom, you would have a new element not found on the periodic table.

Element 2 1/3 would have atoms that cluster in groups of three, sharing 7 electrons between them.