The brainlet question

>>8696065
Kill yourself

>>8696124
My IQ was tested at 163 when I was 9 years old why should kill myself?

>>8696145
no he's right.
kys

>>8696145
Because you're fucking autistic.

>>8696145
>9 years old
>Taking a neurology efficency test, before the neurology is finished forming.
Gosh, yes, that wouldn't cause any errors. :^)

>>8696153
>what is calibration

>/sci/ - mental masturbation

It takes hundreds of people to support a couple of professors. So no, they shouldn't be "killed off."

Further more, "all technological" progress is definitely not done by the top 0.01%. There are sub-geniuses who solve small practical problems every day. Take Elisha Otis, the man who developed the safety catch for elevators. Was this guy a mathematical genius like Newton or Maxwell? Probably not, but his inventions revolutionized elevator technology. Go find me a leading university that doesn't have an elevator.

Sage for shitty thread.

>>8696160
Something you do to a triquater?

In all seriousness, your perception of human intelligent is too simple.

>>8696163
That was 200 years ago lmao and there's no evidence to support that he wasn't highly intelligent you stupid brainlet

>>8696065
If the 99.9% got killed off like you proposed, then the the 0.1% would have to start to plant their own crops, clean their own streets and flip their own burgers, distracting them from science.
You are really dumb OP

File: abc.jpg (59KB, 620x388px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 620x388px

>let's kill off all the useless phone sanitisers

>>8696228
What is AI

If you guys think you're so "smart", how come we aren't colonizing the galaxy yet?

>>8696170
>of human intelligent

>>8696145
How and why do people get IQ tests when they're little kids?

>>8698265
IQ tests were developed for comparison to other people's scores, if a 9 year old's intelligence is comparable to a 20 year old's score, you get a high IQ