The earth is a giant donut. Prove me wrong. Protip: You can't.
Which would you rather have, a car or a goat?
would you be able to float in the middle of that
>>8692952
Would you be pulled apart?
>>8692946
Antarctica. That'll be all.
the usual /sci/ shit post
>>8692946
well you're not wrong, because a donut and a sphere are topologically equivalent
Where would the North Pole be?
>>8693143
Are homeomorphic objects continuosly homeomorphic through arbitrary but equivalent transformations?
>>8693143
no they are not euler characteristic ain't the same, which is a topological invariant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_characteristic
>>8692946
Force of gravity is rather consistant across the whole of the earth, if the earth was a donut gravity would appear weaker around the hole as the mass from the part of the donut above would exert a force in the opposite direction to the part of the donut you're standing on.
I'd draw I diagram but I'm not THAT autistic.
>>8693143
never use the phrase "topologically equivalent" again you disgusting brainlet
>>8692952
Sadly no. Gravity from the Sun and Moon would scew legrange point 0 (center mass) to be away from the donut center.
>>8693635
But, people standing on the inside of the donut will weigh less and be able to jump higher than normal.
>>8692946
>the arctic and antarctic are the same place
>they are frozen because they're in constant shade from the rest of the planet
>they go beyond their poles by curving inwards towards the other side of the planet
>mfw hyperborea is real
>>8693653
I want this donut to happen.
NAO
but then if you were in greenland, you couldn't see the sky when you look upwards....
>>8692946
The view from Norway would be interesting...
>>8692946
Actual shape of the Earth. I know it is true because some guy on YouTube made a video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA3Y0Dxosgc
>>8693837
Lost my shit.
Still, the earth is ovular is it not?
>>8693012
The gravitational pull would balance out on all sides.. It wouldn't be strong enough to pull you apart