Randall Mills / Brilliant Light Power

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brilliant_Light_Power

Critics say it lacks corroborating scientific evidence, and is a relic of cold fusion. Critical analysis of the claims have been published in the peer reviewed journals Physics Letters A, New Journal of Physics, Journal of Applied Physics, and Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. These works note that the proposed theory is inconsistent with quantum mechanics, and that the proposed hydrino states are unphysical and incompatible with key equations that have been experimentally verified many times.

In 1999, the Nobel prize winning physicist Philip Warren Anderson said he is "sure that it's a fraud",[6] and in the same year another Nobel prize winning physicist, Steven Chu, called it "extremely unlikely".[7] In 2009, IEEE Spectrum magazine characterized it as a "loser" technology because "[m]ost experts don't believe such lower states exist, and they say the experiments don't present convincing evidence" and mentioned that Wolfgang Ketterle had said the claims are "nonsense".[8] BLP has announced several times that it was about to deliver commercial products based on Mill's theories but has not delivered a working product.[8]

>>8690217
>criticizes empirical results because conflicts with theory
>discards results in favor of theory

t. Scientists

>>8690224
what results?

>BLP has announced several times that it was about to deliver commercial products based on Mill's theories but has not delivered a working product.[8]

http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/

>>8690203
>claims he's proven physics wrong
>18 years later he still can't provide a demonstration
cranks really are curious creatures

>>8690239
I'm not trolling and only learned about the guy today. What do you mean he hasn't provided a demo in 18 years? Looks like it's been validated by 5 different groups. And what is this if not a demo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfGgHD8e9sM

>>8690245
if it works where's the final product?

>>8690245
>And what is this if not a demo
it's a minute long video of a bright-ass light and a hissing noise
it's completely unclear what's even supposed to be happening, let alone how this is supposed to show that it is

I could make that with a floodlight and a sander

>>8690248
That's an engineering issue not a physics issue.

>>8690251
http://brilliantlightpower.com/validation-reports/

>During April-May 2016, five independent third-party validations of Brilliant Light Power’s SunCell Technology were carried out at BrLP’s facilities in Cranbury, NJ. In each case, a scientist from academia or industry supervised and directed experiments and measurements, with BrLP staff acting in a support role to facilitate the work of the validator. Experimental set-ups were built from components, and instruments were calibrated in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications under the supervision of the validators. Four validation methods were employed to substantiate the SunCell® reaction power levels. These test results all demonstrate up to megawatt net power when compared to reference reactions.

Our conviction that our current understanding of science is infallible is the biggest impediment to breakthrough discoveries.

File: 1340917846909.jpg (540KB, 744x750px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 744x750px

>>8690251
>I could make that with a floodlight and a sander

Correct, but then you would be a crank
And this guy isn't
Now please
Come with us and realise
Energy has to be freed from the jews greed
Revolution is on it's way
Clearly you don't know enough
On this topic
Label it the way you want
Our mastery is infinite
Rekt is all you will ever get
Enlightenment is now for us
CANCERCOLORECTAL
Tantamounts of the good stuff
And don't you worry for me my friend
Later you will be the same

>>8690261
>Our
Who?

>>8690255
It's funny because none of the reporters seems to aknowledge that they indeed wrote these reports. The only place you can find them are on those chains of retard websites.

>>8690203

Get of 4chan Mr. President!

>>8690329
Not an argument.

>>8690347
shhh...

>>8690203
>>8690217
>The purported energy source is based on Mills' assertion that the electron in a hydrogen atom can drop below the lowest energy state known as the ground state.

It's alright guys, he's just another crank. We can all let the thread 404 now.

>>8690402
What could be lower?

Wouldn't you essentially be annihilating mass at that point beyond standard physics?

Mass is literally transforming almost entirely to energy.

Also, how would you contain something that temperature?

>>8690402
+1

Supposedly the magic sun device contains solar cells on the inside. I turned it off after that point. Its another flash in the pan of a dude whos been promising miracles for the last 18 years

>very high power density
>that is used to shine light on photovoltaics
>that converts to electricity
>instead of using the heat to drive a turbine
even IF this wasn't a hoax, whoever designed this has made a lot of incredibly stupid decisions

>>8690609
A bunch of oven mittens

>>8690609
the same way you contain the high temperatures used in metal forging

saw the guy on cnn. says alot about cnn