Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10
Anonymous
Principle of induction from the axioms of R 2017-02-16 04:52:05 Post No. 8679643
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Principle of induction from the axioms of R 2017-02-16 04:52:05 Post No. 8679643
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: griffiths.small.jpg (17KB, 472x324px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 472x324px
Anyone willing to check my math?
I'll provide the snippets from Munkres, Topology first.
>>
File: #1_reference_munkres_topology.png (67KB, 576x181px) Image search:
[Google]
67KB, 576x181px
>>8679643
>>
File: #2_reference_munkres_topology.png (10KB, 300x65px) Image search:
[Google]
10KB, 300x65px
>>8679645
>>
File: #3_reference_munkres_topology.png (122KB, 577x470px) Image search:
[Google]
122KB, 577x470px
>>8679646
>>
File: #4_reference_munkres_topology.png (25KB, 572x80px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 572x80px
>>8679649
>>
File: #5_reference_munkres_topology.png (44KB, 563x264px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 563x264px
>>8679651
>>
This proves the laws of inequalities until (g): [math]1>0[/math].
>>
Here some statements of #3_reference are wrote out.
>>
More from #3_reference.
>>
>>8679643
Before I start to review, are these made by you?
Like, your own text truly. Not modified theory by someone else? If it's a modification, could you provide source so I can get the background.
>>
Conclusion.
>>
>>
>>8679645
>and is of greater logical than mathematical interest
What did he mean by this? Why would there be a difference?
>>
>>8679727
Hmm I tried to review, but these go over my head. I don't know enough about the subject. Sorry.
>>
>>8679649
>defining integers after defining real numbers
>>
>>8679753
>Hmm I tried to review, but these go over my head.
What passages exactly?
I could clarify them.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 10
Thread images: 10