well?
here is my thinking
Ok, so let's start with the easy part.
x+x+x=30 <=> x=10
30+y+y=20 <=> y=5
5+2*z+2*z=9 <=> 4*z=4 <=> z=1
And the fomula is:
Which means, with the values from above, it spells out:
The integral of (10*sin(a))/(2*a) from 0 to infinity.
So here we go:
Let's simplify the inner part of this a bit.
(10*sin(a))/(2*a) <=> (5*sin(a))/a
which means our new formula is:
the integral (5*sin(a))/a from 0 to infinity <=>
5 * the integral (sin(a))/a from 0 to infinity <=>
5* PI/2 ≈ 7.85 If I've done everything properly.
>>8676804
no.
>>8676765
beer=9.999999...
does this change anything?
[math]\int_0^\infty \frac{10 sin(x)}{2x} dx[/math]
[math]5 \int_0^\infty \frac{sin(x)}{x} dx[/math]
do you see the dirichlet integral?
[math]5 \frac{pi}{2}[/math]
[math]2.5 \pi[/math]
>>8676842
9.9999999999 etc = 10
>>8676870
5* Pi/2 is the answer
[math]\int_{}^{} \frac_{sin x}{x}[/math] isn't an elementary function. Therefore, the problem is impossible to solve
>>8677260
>says problem is impossible
>doesnt even do math right
>>8677260
dirichlets integral
>>8677260
[math] \int e^{-x^2} dx [/math]
is nonelementary as well, but
[math] \int_0^\infty e^{-x^2} dx [/math]
is known exactly.
>>8676870
What's the primitive of sin(x)/x ?
That's where I got stuck
>>8677487
are you from the other thread?
>>8677461
So what is it then, Mr. Smartass?
>>8676765
you fucktards you cant take the integral of sinx/x.
well you can but its theoretical
Fucking brainlets. ∫sin(t)/t dt = Si(t) in non-elementary functions.
so the exact answer is:
-10pi+20Si(30)
approximate:
-0.0808
>>8677739
Holy shit i guess i'm just as retarded at you guys.
I thought the lower boundary was burger+burger+bottle.
exact answer is:
-10pi
approximate:
-31.416
>>8676770
this is the only answer
other posts are brainlets
t. CERN scientist
I think OP trolled us all into solving his homework.
>>8677821
nah i made the pic
>tfw planetoidbrain
>>8677570
I forget, fucking google it brainlet. it's that one trick where you square it and evaluate it as a double integral after transforming to polar coordinates.
>>8677980
>brainlet
>brainlet
>planetoidbrain
>brainlet
why is /sci/ so weird?
>>8677487
>>8677260
>>8677668
[math]\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin(u)}{u} du[/math]
Write [math]C_R: z = Re^{ia} \Rightarrow dz = iRe^{ia}da ,\;\; 0 \leq a \leq \pi[/math]
Then [math] C_r: z = \frac{1}{R} e^{ia} \Rightarrow dz = \frac{1}{R} i e^{ia}da ,\;\; -\pi \leq a \leq 0[/math]
Write [math] R_1: -R \leq x \leq -\frac{1}{R}[/math]
And [math] R_2: \frac{1}{R} \leq x \leq R[/math]
Consider the integral over the complex plane of the closed region [math]C = C_R \cup C_r \cup R_1 \cup R_2[/math]: [math]\oint_C \frac{e^{iz}}{z} dz[/math], which equals 0 by cauchy's theorem. Expanding the integral:
[math]\displaystyle 0 = \oint_C \frac{e^{iz}}{z} dz = \int_{C_R} \frac{e^{iRe^{ia}}}{Re^{ia}} iRe^{ia}da + \int_{C_r} \frac{e^{(1/R) ie^{ia}}}{(1/R) e^{ia}} i \frac{1}{R} e^{ia} da + \int_{R_1} \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx + \int_{R_2} \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx = i \int_{C_R} e^{iRe^{ia}} da + i \int_{C_r} e^{1/R i e^{ia}} da + \int_{R_1} \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx + \int_{R_2} \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx[/math]
[math]\displaystyle = i \int_0^\pi e^{iRe^{ia}} da + i \int_{-\pi}^0 e^{(1/R) i e^{ia}} da + \int_{-R}^{-1/R} \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx + \int_{1/R}^R \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx[/math]
>>8678339
Let's look at the first integral:
[math]i \int_0^\pi e^{iRe^{ia}} da = i \int_0^\pi e^{iR \cos(a)} e^{-R\sin(a)} da[/math], as [math]R \rightarrow \infty,\, e^{-R\sin(a)} \rightarrow 0[/math], so [math]i \int_0^\pi e^{iR \cos(a)} e^{-R\sin(a)} da \rightarrow 0[/math]
Now for the second:
[math]i \int_{-\pi}^0 e^{(1/R) i e^{ia}} da = -i \int_0^\pi e^{(1/R) i e^{ia}} da[/math], which becomes [math]- i \int_0^\pi 1 da = - i \pi[/math] as [math]R \rightarrow \infty[/math]
Taking the limit [math]R \rightarrow \infty[/math]
[math]0 = 0 -i\pi + \int_{-\infty}^0 \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx + \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx -i\pi \Rightarrow \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx = i\pi[/math]
[math]\Rightarrow \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\cos(x)}{x}dx + i\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\sin(x)}{x}dx = i\pi \Rightarrow \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\sin(x)}{x}dx = \pi[/math]
By symmetry: [math]\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin(x)}{x}dx = \frac{\pi}{2}[/math]
>>8678027
We're all insecure about our intelligence
>>8678346
It's just countour integration over this region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methods_of_contour_integration
>>8678423
Come on guys, that’s too complicated. Given
[eqn]\int\ \frac{\sin x}{x}\ dx=\int\left (\int e^{-xy}\sin(x)\ dy\right )dx=\int \int e^{-xy}\sin(x)\ dx\ dy=\int \left (\frac{-ye^{-xy}\sin(x)\ -\ e^{-xy}\cos(x)}{1+y^{2}} \right )dy=\int \frac{1}{1+y^{2}}\ dy=\arctan y+C[/eqn]then [eqn]\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{5\sin x}{x}\ dx=5\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\int_{0}^{n}\frac{\sin x}{x}\ dx=5\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\arctan y\ |_{0}^{n}=5\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\arctan n\ -\ \arctan 0=5\left [ \left ( \frac{\pi}{2} \right )\ -\ \left ( 0 \right ) \right ]=\frac{5\pi}{2} [/eqn] Now THAT, imho, is as simple as intro level shit gets. I got a picture for you too. I cleaned it up while typing.
>>8678509
wtf did you just spend your whole night working on an autism picture math problem?
hahh ahahahahah
All these plebs falling for the elaborate homework thread
>>8678597
real, non memed, 100%, literal, in the flesh - Autism
AND STILL WRONG
>>8678521
It's almost like people browsing /sci/ would be interested in solving Science and Math problems. Go figure.
you are all clearly wrong
>absence of operator between two variables indicates addition
it's clearly
burger + 2(beer)^2=9
hence beer=sqrt(2)
brainlets
>>8678638
thank you for you informative post. it was well received and im a better person after reading it.
>>8678652
True.
However it doesn't actually change the final answer of the problem, since z^2 = 2 if you consider that and with the other assumption, 2z = 2, if you consider z = 1 from assuming it's 2z+2z.
>>8676871
dude no
>>8676765
The answer is nasty hangover and diarrhoea
>>8679103
>2017
>trying to heaven a thread
Ha!
>>8676765
Bottle * infinity / sgn(beer)
>>8676765
>>8680341
>>8680344
>>8678423
>question is a parody of those Facebook math question images
>uses food and beverages as variables
An unnecessarily complex answer is the correct way to respond to this question. The only way to improve the answer or make it any more appropriate would be to apply even more difficult or excessive methods.
>>8678652
>beer=sqrt(2)
So beer is a completely artificial construct, devised by mathematicians who reject constructivism (another way of spelling "common sense") and whose only purpose is pacifying the masses who can't, won't and shan't learn rational trigonometry and the concept of quadrance? That seems about right.
>>8679103
>convergence
more like convirgin
that is you
>>8676765
Do we need to answer in fast food notation?
>trying to integrate sine of hotdog