If the centre of a black hole has no volume then it doesn't exist

>>8664371
No center has volume, as the center is a point and points don't have volume.
But they surely exist.

>>8664371
You actually don't have to go that far. In the mathematical prescription electrons also don't have any volume. Would you say they don't exist?

>>8664413
If they don't have volume yes

>>8664408
No, they don't exist since they're made of nothing

File: raw.gif (2MB, 390x218px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 390x218px

Perform an experiment for me:

Draw a circle centered on the origin of a standard X-Y graph. Now find the center of the circle. What is the volume of the center of that circle? Does the center exist?

>>8664440
The center point is as real as fractions.

>>8664440
Circles don't exist since they don't have volume in the first place. I'll assume you're talking about a sphere. In which case there's still no point which is the centre because it would have to be infinitely small which means it doesn't exist.

>>8664371
The smallest possible volume is 1 Planck volume. All the mass in a black hole is condensed inside 1 Planck volume. So it does have volume.

However, that Planck volume is no longer "in our universe" because it is across the event horizon.

>>8664460
>The smallest possible volume is 1 Planck volume.
Wrong. Planck lengths are not quanta of of space, nor any other planck unit quanta of anything.

>>8664472
Planck time is quantum time. Explain why you think it's not.

>>8664371
Your thoughts have no volume therefore they don't exist

>>8664408
>>8664413
>>8664440
>>8664472
>>8665670

Stop replying to gorilla threads.

>>8665670
my thoughts come from my brain and my brain has volume.

>>8665680
Careful there, son...

>>8664371
Mass should always be moving faster towards the gravametric center of a black sun (black hole): but mass should never reach it. This is the inconsistency in the big bang theory...

How did a particle at 0x0x0 (singularity) ever reach a point one unit away when the smallest step is a zero unit point? (I think cubes make more sense than points; the cartesian plane should be modeled on 0x0x0 cubes rather than points.).