Why didn't they go back and look at it?

>>8664232
it's probably just a rock. Rovers are expensive, routes have to be carefully planned so that the rover will keep working as long as possible.

>spot giant enemy crab on hostile desert planet
>hurr durr why didn't we meet it

are u pply retard?

>>8664255
Was there ever a general consensus on the geological processes that could have formed such a structure? I mean anyone would agree that it's markedly different from the surrounding rock, as well as any rock we've seen on the planet in general.

>routes have to be carefully planned so that the rover will keep working as long as possible

I understand this, like there are some other formations that have turned up in these images that I would say were very interesting but not worth turning back for, but I feel like this one is different from all of those.

>>8664232
Source?

>>8664284
ayy lmao

>>8664295
From NASA themselves

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

File: important_mission.jpg (289KB, 1536x1371px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1536x1371px

>>8664255
>Rovers are expensive, routes have to be carefully planned...

>>8664303
God damn Mars looks so fucking cool. Makes me wish I could just go there and study all those geological features.

>>8664303
Neat. Always thought that was photoshopped

>>8664255
t. alien

>>8664284

A boulder fell and shattered a rock on the cliff.

>>8664303
Wait, how big is that?

File: missoula-outcrop.jpg (280KB, 1910x900px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1910x900px

>>8664284
>>Was there ever a general consensus on the geological processes that could have formed such a structure?
lighting and camera conditions. And in this case, JPEG compression algorithms, crab is less prominent in original:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

>> as well as any rock we've seen on the planet in general.
I tell you what, you know what's unlike any other rocks we seen on mars? Those beautiful fucking outcroppings. That's what the rockhounds really want.

File: 500526-nasa-mars-curiosity-rover-mars-murray-buttes-mount-sharp-mast-camera-ashwin-vasavada-coloured-images-of-mars-rocks-nasa-4.jpg (135KB, 1344x1200px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1344x1200px

>>8664381
Look at this shit man. Doesn't this just give you a rock boner?

File: 1362117907558.gif (41KB, 181x153px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 181x153px

>>8664381
>lighting and camera conditions. And in this case, JPEG compression algorithms
I'm so fucking tired of this bullshit explanation. First of all, the "crab" is in a shadow, so lighting has nothing to do with it. As with the jpeg compression, the rest of the image looks absolutely fine, there is no reason to assume that somehow, magically, it accounts for an object to suddenly appear.

>>8664396
>the "crab" is in a shadow, so lighting has nothing to do with it
You can't make this up

File: GUjwUM6.jpg (73KB, 846x1157px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 846x1157px

Curiosity is not there to look at rocks. It has no time to go back and look.

>>8664306
NASA had to do that on purpose

>>8664399
Dude the crab thing is way too prominent to be caused by bad lighting. I seriously don't understand why you faggots just regurgitate obvious bullshit. I'm not saying it's aliens, but surely weird geological features like that should be worthy of further exploration?

>>8664471
I think it looks weird too, but saying that shadows aren't lighting is just stupid

File: retard.jpg (53KB, 427x388px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 427x388px

>>8664473
How can shadows be lighting if they are obviously darking?

If they say it's just a rock formation, it's cool and all, but show me 1 (one) example here on Earth that looks even remotely similar to that Mars crab thing, and I'll believe the scientists. And it can't be a picture of a spider or crab here on Earth, it has to be a geological formation.

File: serveimage.jpg (93KB, 640x447px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 640x447px

>>8664496

>>8664496
>but show me 1 (one) example here on Earth that looks even remotely similar to that Mars crab thing

Check your Earth privilege shitlord, don't apply your filthy earth-human perceptions to this beautiful Planet of color. It's rock formations are JUST RIGHT, even if they don't harbor any kind of lifeforms, deal with it bigot. #staywoke #redprideworldwide

>>8664516

>yfw the people you impersonated will shoot down the mars colonization project

>>8664476
shadows are not 100% devoid of light are they?
different levels of lighting makes brighter and darker areas, yes?
the darker areas we call shadows, yes?
so lighting conditions is what this is, yes?
after play time you can have some candy and watch cartoons, yes?

File: 150828091044-mars-iguana-super-169[1].jpg (135KB, 1100x619px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1100x619px

>>8664496
never mind the crab rocks
What about de dinosaur fossils?

What's the deal with the shitty camera lens resolution. Does NASA just use whatever cheap shit they have lying about. Why no top shelf camera and zoom technology.

>>8664645
This is just so fucking stupid.

File: Angry_red_planet_1960.jpg (58KB, 640x455px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x455px

>>8664232
Probably a baby one of these

>>8664728
>this is a rock
>this is a fucking rock
I'm sorry but the tinfoils may be right on this one

File: aliens-notsaying.jpg (49KB, 585x500px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 585x500px

>>8664471
>I'm not saying it's aliens,
>but it was aliens.

>>8664711
It's cropped.

Granted, the original is only 1200p - or at least that's what they released to the public

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg

File: article-2233294-1609D0DE000005DC-956_964x641.jpg (142KB, 964x641px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 964x641px

>>8664496
Weathering processes are different on Earth than on Mars so even if we don't find a perfect analog it's meaningless.

It's not like we don't have weird shit here on Earth anyway.

>>8664232
It's mostly an artifact caused by deblurring. When you are deblurring you always emphasize frequencies in the image that contain more noise than signal. So your result is mostly fantasy.

>>8664745
Why release in a lossy format though - why are these not PNG or some shit? Is NASA hard up for web space?

File: 2013%2F05%2F28%2Fb5%2FHitler.42cd0.jpg (62KB, 950x534px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 950x534px

>>8664232
Because
>Seth Shostak, Senior Astronomer and Director of the Center for SETI Research, said he gets images showing formations such as this one about once a week.

>“Those that send them to me are generally quite excited, as they claim that these frequently resemble SOMETHING you wouldn’t expect to find on the rusty, dusty surface of the Red Planet,” he said via email. “It’s usually some sort of animal, but occasionally even weirder objects such as automobile parts. Maybe they think there are cars on Mars.”

>He said it’s really just a phenomenon called pareidolia, or the brain’s ability to make shapes out of random objects — like seeing animals in clouds.

>“Far from being a vision defect, pareidolia has a lot of survival value if you need to quickly spot predators in the jungle, for instance,” he wrote.

>He added:

>“Recognizing a crab in a landscape filled with wind-weathered rocks is no more surprising — nor more significant — than seeing a winking face in a semi-colon followed by a parenthesis. ;) “

Just like this teapot isn't actually Hitler.

>>8664750
I'd say bandwidth and signal loss - but I somehow doubt JPG would be the optimal solution for either, particularly signal loss.

>>8664762
Maybe just legacy accessibility conversion for their site - the only alternatives for that being BMP (freaking huge) and GIF (256 colors).

Am a bit curious as to what sorta format the original data was in though - perhaps a higher resolution.

File: 1604ML0081980040505502E01_DXXX.jpg (137KB, 1328x1184px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1328x1184px

>>8664757
Yeah, while I can see why he'd assume that as soon as someone brought it up, he clearly he didn't look at that thing.

It's practically screaming, "Come little rover - come here and stick your arm in me - LIVE UP TO YOUR NAME BOI!"

...I mean, this is what the damned thing is looking at now. (yay)

>>8664757
Calling everything pareidolia instead of what it actually is - doctored images made to evoke these responses - only fuels other conspiracy theorists, since it overstates what pareidolia is actually capable of.

>>8664772
Saying NASA is doctoring images is even more tinfoil than assuming it's alien life they missed and can't be bothered to go back for due to bureaucracy.

File: backinmyday-tinfoil.jpg (47KB, 400x480px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 400x480px

>>8664733
>>8664773
>tinfoil
foil is aluminum now, Grandpa

File: opportunity_2x.png (102KB, 1480x557px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1480x557px

>>8664255
Dude, the mission was over in 2012... I think they can fucking play around a bit now.

Curiosity and Opportunity are putting in insane overtime - damn things just won't die.

>>8664255
not to mention that that thing probably wouldnt even be there when they returned anyway

>>8664511
Kek

>>8664728
I think we may be getting into the realm of interpreting jpeg artifacts as physical structures here...


>>8664882
Well played.

>>8664772
>since it overstates what pareidolia is actually capable of.

What?

How many people are convinced that pic related is a sculpture of a face, carved into the face of Mars by an ancient alium civilization? Pareidolia seems capable of quite a lot.

File: real-face-on-mars-9.jpg (137KB, 1331x1024px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1331x1024px

>>8665056
It is even better with the pic, sorry.

File: mars anomaly.jpg (109KB, 970x566px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 970x566px

>>8664645
Explain this, sheeple.

>>8664771
All those dead fish...

>>8664781
You can still get the tin, for hatmaking purposes/

File: 124-8109-05910.jpg (42KB, 300x364px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 300x364px

>>8665056
>alium civilization

>>8665056
It's a little easier to blame pareidolia when the object spotted is a face or some earthen critter... But the object in question, if nothing else, presents a clearly anomalous surface. It might be a plant, it might be a crabish thingie, sure. At the very least is an unusual geological formation, and, had someone caught it at the time, it certainly would've been worth checking out.

Now, I suppose, we should give NASA the benefit of the doubt while leaving room for mistakes. It maybe they missed this odd formation for so long, that by the time someone pointed it out, they were just too many miles away to make it worth turning back for. It seems doubtful the rover is sending 1200p JPG images, so maybe they have higher resolution images makes it clearer what it is. Maybe it's clear from said images that merely sand piled up in an odd pattern due to one of those month-long global windstorms Mars occasionally has.

But to say the object isn't objectively incongruous, and to write off every incongruous finding as pareidolia, making the entire effort of sending the thing rather pointless.

That is by far the oddest thing I've ever seen on mars, I'd have sent the rover over for a quick look, can you imagine if that actually did turn out to be a lifeform?

>>8664496
If it is a crab, where are the pictures of all the other crabs? They'll all look pretty much alike, so spotting them in other pictures should be easy. I'll wait.

>>8664786
Rovers are expensive, it doesn't make sense to play around

File: pareidolia_jesus.jpg (17KB, 265x265px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 265x265px

>>8665108
>It might be...

Might be nothng made to look like something by image manipulation, Might be trying to read too much data into one compressed image.

Might be that the guys at NASA, who would become famous and get their budget upped manifold times, know about all those possibilities.

>It's a little easier to blame pareidolia when the object spotted is a face or some earthen critter

Like a crab?

>But to say the object isn't objectively incongruous, and to write off every incongruous finding as pareidolia, making the entire effort of sending the thing rather pointless.

Well, no, when they actually see anomalous or interesting things, they do their best to study them. But it is worth considering that they may be able to resolve some "anomalies" that would leave you or me stumped, without spending a lot of time or effort.

Finally, an anomaly that shows up after manipulating the image is not as compelling to me as it is to some folks, I guess.

For grins, my favorite pareidolia picture -- truly amazing.

>>8665125
The investment was made with the assumption that the mission would be over in 2012. It's effectively paid itself off several times over.

I'm not saying we should start doing dune buggy races with the thing, but going back to check out something interesting that ya missed hardly seems to be a high risk sacrifice at this point.

>>8665135
Well it's an objectively crab-like formation, I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting it is an actual crab or crab sculpture.

>Finally, an anomaly that shows up after manipulating the image is not as compelling to me as it is to some folks, I guess.
Have you even looked at the original image?
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg
That is clearly an anomaly... It may not be ayylmao, but ya don't very often come across something that blatantly out of place in this endless series of banal images.

Again, it maybe in the original unreleased image you can see it is packed sand, but I think it's just as likely NASA just missed it for too long. Not that I can really say one way or the other without knowing the minute to minute details of those operation sgo - I also dunno how many hours or days they are away from it now.

>>8665160
I actually looks like a coral to me. Someone memed fossils, but this one really reminds me of one

File: mars torso.jpg (87KB, 889x493px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 889x493px

>>8665136
>I'm not saying we should start doing dune buggy races with the thing, but going back to check out something interesting that ya missed hardly seems to be a high risk sacrifice at this point.

I disagree -- the area around "Hidden Valley" was dangerous for the rover (soft sands) and going back to it would be a needless risk without something more than "if you expand this until the compression artifacts start to look like things, you can see a crab."

>>8665135
>Well it's an objectively
subjectively, but yeah, I see it too in the expanded inages

>crab-like formation,

Not until you blow it up enough to see the compression artifacts, prior to that isit is a blob among a million other blobs in a complicated pile of rocks.

>I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting it is an actual crab or crab sculpture.

Have you read the thread?

>Have you even looked at the original image?
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg
>That is clearly an anomaly...

I have, I don't see much anomalous there until you start expanding it. I also do note the ground between the Crab Monster and the rover -- doesn't look like you are going to get much closer in any case, but then I don't drive Mars rovers.

Besides, the obvious "Pharaohnic" carving of a female torso, seen in this cropped image of the dame area, is much more interesting, and not just because I like female torsos more than crabs.

>>8665180
Well certainly coral on Mars would be the find of the millenia.

Meh, it could be anything, I'm just saying it's certainly unusual.

>>8665186
Are really going to compare those clear ravines to that spikey patch? This isn't the same random lines forming a new pattern - that's a different material from the rock it is on. ...Or at the very least, the same material as the sand, suspended somehow. (Although, checking with photoshop, the color drift suggest otherwise, but then again, f*cking NASA and their JPEGs.)

You may have a point about not being able to get within sampling range, but judging by the sequence of images in the series, they didn't stop to take additional photos, nor go back in the next igr, so either they could identify it, or they missed it.

why don't they just release the full images anyway instead of these shitty jpegs?

>>8665198
>so either they could identify it, or they missed it.

I would tend to agree, with the third possibility, that it did not strike them as sufficiently unusual to be worth worrying about. These guys spent over a month looking at if a slab of suspected hydrologic mineral beneath the rover’s tires, I would discount out of hand that they'd ignore an obvious anomaly, which I don't think the image of the Crab shows in any case.

Sidebar -- here's why you want manned exploration. A real time, real set of eyes and a real brain on site could have walked a bit closer and either said "Holy shit, it's a crab!" or "Oh, funny how the sand and shadows looked like a crab for a mement there."

Ps: Somebody upstream (can't be arsed to go find them to reply to) wondered how long ago the pic was taken -- it is from August 5, 2014. So going back to look again is not happening. Fucking crab is likely dead by now.

>>8665208
You are implying implications.

>>8665210
More like
>Holy shit, it's a crab!
>Holy shit, it's jumping me!
>WTF
>Alternative
>Oh shit, what is this, better not go there

>>8665215
>>Holy shit, it's a crab!
>>Holy shit, it's jumping me!
>>IT'S FUCKING DELICIOUS, MARS NEEDS MOAR BUTTER!!

>>8665218
humans are literally space orcs m8

>>8665208
Entirely speculation, but maybe: >>8664765

It's a government organization, we all know they suck at making web sites.

>>8665215
Mars crabs can't digest Earth meat.

>>8665224
What about President Trump and his websites

They are always pretty high quality desu

>>8665237
But their bite is poisonous

>>8665240
Tell Trump to pass an executive order that NASA must use PNG format on their website come Mars 2020.

>>8665243
Venomous, not poisonous.

>>8665244
Just making a change.org petition

File: 0707MR0030040140402483E01_DXXX.jpg (237KB, 1344x1200px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1344x1200px

>Everyone complains that NASA should have taken another photo of it.
>Spend so much time complaining that they miss the fact NASA did take another photo of it.
>Base all their opinions on the image that looks like it has legs and never look at the one where it's clear it dosen't

File: hmmmayy.png (651KB, 838x376px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 838x376px

>>8665255
Oh? (Left one is yours)

>>8665136
They are checking out things that are interesting, just not things you schizos find interesting.

>>8665279
Normal rocks are very fucking interesting

>>8665272

If you're still seeing a crab in the left image and not just a lump of rock, it's probably too late for you.

>>8665314
I see a low res pic on the left and a little higher res pic in a slightly different angle on the right man

>>8665047
>implying jpeg artifacts look like crabs

>>8664232

they didn't know whether or not it would be aggressive.

>>8665272
>IT PULLED IN ITS LEGS BETWEEN PICTURES!!!!!!!

File: crab-sculpture-thailand.jpg (56KB, 600x398px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x398px

>>8665314
>just a lump of rock
Lrn2sculpture, thou Philistine

>>8665255
>Crab is just a rock
>Torso from >>8665186 is still there though.

>>8665321
Did you notice how, hen you can see another view, it's just a rock after all?

>>8664728
What if it's not a crab, but a bipedal sitting down

>>8665409
>Yeah, lets turn everything in existence in such an angle (and photograph it with shitty resolution) that it just looks like a random rock
>Dont even consider any other angle or resolution than the one that makes it look like a rock

I can even turn that same shitty argument against you man

>>8665135
>favorite pareidolia picture
Forget the Jesus there
There is clearly a man in a suit next to him
No way this isn't manipulated kek

>>8665135
>guys at NASA, who would become famous
name one guy at NASA who is famous, pleb

>>8665437
Sure --in which case ALL of those rocks might be crabs, why did NASA not investigate the thousands of crabs seen in these images? Is it a cover up?

No, of course not, checking millions of rocks to see if any of them are crabs would be a moronic thing to do. So you look around, with your slow remote camera, and if there is anything that looks a bit interesting, before you risk your zillion dollar lander traversing a boulder field up into the lee of a crumbling cliff face, , you check and se if the same thing is visible in other pictures from other angles. If, when you do that, it is shown that it was not that interesting after all, such as when space crabs turn out to be just rocks when you look at them from a couple of angles, then you move on.

Now, if the other angle still shows a crab, or shows that he's climbed up the cliff a few meters, or is holding up a "Earth go home" sign, guess what? NASA is ecstatic, they've made the discovery of the millennium, they are all famous and get to fuck hot science nerd groupie chicks in the bars that night, while their project funding goes through the roof. It would be their most cherished dreams coming true.

>>8665452
The guy at NASA who said "HOLY FUCKING SHIT, GUYS, LOOK, THERE ARE FUCKING CRABS ON MARS! I JUST DISCOVERED LIFE ON MARS!" -- he'd be pretty famous.

>>8665452
Neil Armstrong

>>8665448
I had to go google the pic and find a website that talked about it before I could see what made up the Jesus image. That is wild.

>>8665452
That guy who wore the sexist shirt his girlfriend made him while landing on a muthafuggin comet, he was pretty famous for a few days.

>>8665135
I just can't see what makes up Jesus here.

>>8665490
A baby in a white bonnet. The "eye" is child's face.

>>8665505
Holy shit

File: pareidolia15 mars bigfoot.jpg (184KB, 714x394px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 714x394px

>>8664232
Never mind rock crabs, why didn't NASA stop and talk to this guy???

>>8665464
>Neil Armstrong
>died 2012
>no longer at NASA

>>8665508
I know, right?

>>8665512
He was just chilling. It's rude to talk to people when they just want to be alone, y'know.

File: Moon hoax confirmed.jpg (73KB, 722x598px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 722x598px

>>8665516
That's what THEY want you to think.

>>8665518
I dunno, looks like he might be lifting his hand to wave.

>Be me.
>Basking in the feeble solar energy on a fine day on slowly dying planet.
>Earth machine drives by.
>Be friendly, wave.
>Drives on, ignoring me.
>Of course you know, this means war.

>>8664389
think of potential fossils. god damn.

>>8664642
if the entire thing is in shadow that means the entire thing has nothing that'd be forming fucking crabs via light dipshit

>>8664255
t. martian crab

>tfw just want aliens to come and fucking destroy Earth so I know they're real and something interesting to happen

fucking movies ruin everything by pretending anything interesting is ever going to happen in your life time instead of just being a meaningless wagecuck and then dying

>>8665135
Why do you write skipping lines all the time? Do you perhaps like poetry? This isn't how you write a poem though.

File: 1451865987985.jpg (49KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1920x1080px

nasa is a DISINFORMATION outlet to earth.

>>8665880
Sometimes it is how you write paragraphs.

>>8664414
ken you FUCKING RETARD

>>8664746
That's the corpse of an elephant that looked back at Sodom as it was destroyed

>>8665437
its a shill

>>8664771
If we investigated every weird shaped rock on mars just to satisfy every boy who cried wolf, we'd still only be 10ft from the landing

couldnt you just file a freedom of information request to NASA regarding the high res version of this picture?

https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/FOIA/

>>8665135
Took me a while to see the little kid rather than Jesus' face. That's a good picture.

>>8666137
>couldnt you just file a freedom of information request to NASA regarding the high res version of this picture?

If there s one, it is likely unnecessary to go to that much trouble -- just contact the public affairs office, if you can't find a site that has it.

Reminder that CIA remote viewed ancient ayylmaos on Mars

>>8665935
Ken is the King Troll
Show some respect

File: mars-creature2.jpg (387KB, 1047x449px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1047x449px

>>8664733
>>8664728
When you actually zoom in on the picture here
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00710/mcam/0710MR0030150070402501E01_DXXX.jpg
you can see that the 'creature' is way less clearly seen.

>>8666566
>When you actually zoom in on the picture
...it still looks like a fckn CRAB

>>8665900
dubs confirm?

File: The_Mars_Monolith.jpg (8KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 220x220px

SOMEONE EXPLAIN THIS THEN

>>8664306
>be human
>send machine to another planet
>first made man art on the planet is now a dick drawing

never change you glorious bastards.

>>8665938
hahahaa loled hard.

>>8665069

looks like three cocooned martians waiting for the Rover to pass.

Might be defense mechanism.

>>8665215

I fucking hate that evry time something interesting is happening, we have a potato picture or rover cannot drive on the soft sand, or files were lost or whatever.

There is too much too much shit going on.


Aliens are real and thats a crab.

Now we search for sponge bob.

>>8665512
Looks like that famous yeti in stride picture.

>>8666680
the next step in human evolution

>>8664232
Because they already know life exists in northern Canada--

Their goal is to convince you chumps that this fucking this is on Mars.

>>8664255
>expensive
that's quite an understatement

File: large.png (198KB, 500x271px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 500x271px

> "find" pic related

why can't space be more like heavy metal?

>

>>8664278
Kekd

>>8667700
Northern Canada is famous for it's cliff-dwelling crabs.

>>8667799
It has been a long time since I saw Heavy Metal, but me recollection is that people tended to get killed or maimed pretty badly.

>>8665679

how can you see it without light?

not OP you're talking at just an observer

is that a facehugger?

>>8665935
Now that was too far, tell your son to stop that

File: hqdefault.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

Some asshole will set a dwarf cannon up soon

Looks like something you'd go out of your way to have a look at if it was possible.

This is why boots on Mars is the best option.

>>8664278

this so fucking hard, and maximum keks

File: Monolith55103h-crop.jpg (43KB, 563x430px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 563x430px

>>8666680

There's a monolith on Phobos too.
>captcha - Identity street signs
>Roswell Dr

>>8668635
holy moly

>>8666680
camera angle and lighting conditions

File: lunokhod-womensday.jpg (29KB, 580x381px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 580x381px

>>8664466
The Russians did it better. They purposely drew boobs on the Moon.

>>8668635
It's probably just a rock.

>>8666566

It still looks like a biological entity

>>8665687
Kek

Because it's fake like everything else they've been putting out since the 90s to secure funding

>>8666600
Quad dubs
Those are a big set

File: proof.jpg (381KB, 1344x1200px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1344x1200px

>>8664389
No one's even going to mention this? Sure is Illuminati coverup in here.

>>8665059
It is better, that's an angled hill, if I've seen one.

>>8668773

Gj

>>8668773
that's just a rock formation with funny lighting after jpeg artifacting and pareidolia.

>>8668773
that's cohagen

>>8666680
>>8668635
>Rocks cast shadows

>>8669391
Nice
Pretty well preserved for being there 28 ish years

>>8665452
https://science.jpl.nasa.gov/images/people-627.jpg

File: happy twingo.png (60KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 400x400px

>>8664786
>Opportunity is still alive

>>8665069
Rover shit.

File: Opportunity-devilish-view-ridge-PIA20012-br2.jpg (775KB, 1020x1024px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 1020x1024px

>>8671689

>>8665401
kek

File: 1478741455855.jpg (50KB, 960x626px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 960x626px

holy shit.....
you see it, right.....?

>>8672959

Holy shit, I never realized Alaska is large than mars. Really makes you wonder at all the fantastic discoveries that are waiting for us there.

>>8672990
Can't decide if you are retarded or I just really missed your joke.

>>8672996
This is how I approach pretty much every thread on /sci/

>>8668773
is that reaL?

>>8673438

Yes, of course. Why would you think it isn't?

>>8665452

buzz lightyear

>>8674823

Is he still alive? I know armstrong died

>>8674828
Too soon, Aonon...

File: terra-formars-.jpg (185KB, 870x836px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 870x836px

>>8664728
Looks more like a door than an alien. Maybe their base is behind it.

>>8664255
t. ayy lmao

>>8664232
Its clearly a space starfish