smart people are ugly people compensating for being ugly
>>8662984
Thank God I'm a dumbass!
>CS guys are that attractive
Bullshit. We are nerds who rarely shower, with glasses like bottle bottoms. Half of us are fat fucks and the other half are thin as sticks.
>>8663003
did you just completely ignore the first graph or what
>>8663003
don't worry anon you're not attractive according to the graphs. you really dodged a bullet there huh
>>8662984
What the fuck are Leisure Studies
>>8663003
There's plenty of attractive normies in CS.
>>8662984
Source for graph? Feels like pseudoscience.
I believe that attractiveness lowers a person's inclination to develop their personality and intellect, especially among women, so yes, ugly people are more likely to study more difficult topics.
There are plenty of attractive people in engineering fields though, and they generally fall under two categories: A - socially inept, and B - super egomaniac ...and every now and then there's someone who could be a 'cool kid' if they wanted but chooses not to
>>8663003
SWE student here. That's a goddamn meme. There are plenty of chads in CS now.
>>8663235
what the fuck is SWE? Suck Wang Education?
>>8663003
Maybe at shit schools, lol.
>>8662984
r = shit
>>8662984
>leisure studies
what the fuck
>>8662984
explain niggers then.
checkmate, atheists.
>those r values
hello climatologist
>>8663646
/thread
>no one read the article
First graph is rating professors on attractiveness by students. The second and third are rating attractiveness of students by students.
The take away was that males had a slight positive correlation with attractiveness and IQ/profession. Females on the other hand were inverse.
Professors in STEM subjects ranked lower on attractiveness due to lack of relatability or looks.
>>8663179
Might be Tourism
>>8662984
>Linear regression over that mess
>Trying to measure a subjective matter
>Somehow people actually take IQ seriously
lmfao
>>8663646
Thought the exact same thing
Graph is shit