In Quantum Physics, if mere human observation can influence the interactions of subatomic particles, will observation of a trained chimpanzee do the same thing?
At what point in the animal kingdom do species no longer influence the mechanisms of Quantum Physics through mere observation?
what is it about QM that attracts so many laymen?
>>8656793
popular buzzword.
>>8656754
>At what point in the animal kingdom do species no longer influence the mechanisms of Quantum Physics through mere observation?
When they no longer have functioning eyes and cannot built something that can visually measure.
>>8656754
All it proves is that we are "always" subjective. Fools mistake their subjectively-fabricated objectivity for objectivity.
>>8656754
God, it just means the means to observate quantum activities will affect the result, it's not actual "seeing".
Imagine you want to count how many burgers are left in the fridge, but every time you open the door, the machines randomly removes 1d6 burgers and you can't know how many, you just know it does [spoiler] you fat ass [/spoiler]
>Copenhagen
pop zoz
can someone explain the quantum mechanics for me!
The observer effect doesn't come from a researcher viewing the results of a measurement. The act of measuring itself inherently disrupts the thing being measured. So if you have a measurement the system is disturbed irrespective of who or what looks at the measurement
>>8656941
this is about as slow paced as it can get, but still good quality teaching
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCAxGTt7nLg&list=PLOarn8QL6W_ImlqPOMluvxIUx9hkWMiTY
>tfw photons and electrons fuck up your experiments
>>8656793
Proves the existence of God
Materialism BTFO
>>8656754
>if mere human observation can influence the interactions of subatomic particles
It can't, you dunce.