How "random" are Quantum Fluctuations?
>>8656602
More random than you think
>>8656602
more than tree-fiddy randometres
Enough for cryptography
>>8656637
http://www.entropykey.co.uk/# forgot source
>>8656642
i like this
how big is my penis?
>>8656602
Each one is 50/50, either it's random or it's not
Perfectly random, but not in the way you think.
People misunderstand a probability density function by thinking that it reperesents an electron or some shit constantly zipping around and you have a certain probability of "finding" it somewhere. That's not the case.
Look at pic related. O', or the 'sensor' (something that the particle can impart energy onto) is always within P' (the particle's) probability density. It is now that it's important to really think about what exactly counts as an "observation". After some thought, it should be self evident that an observation is really just an interaction, which is simply an evergy exchange between particles.
Now it becomes clear that what was before thought of as a probability of 'finding' the particle at any given location is really just the immediate probability of the particle giving some energy to O'.
>>8656602
As random as 9gag! lol XD.