https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ2rJC6pbGI Why isn't modern philosopher Jason Silva on /sci/ ,/lit/ ,/tv/, and possibly more? To me it seems as if this modern philosopher perfectly captures decades of philosophy and knows what a Philosophers job is; to take something more or less complicated that would take paragraphs, perhaps days to explain, and turn it into a few words, a sigh, or a sentence?
>>8654607
because philosophy is for fags
> hurr let me just pick a field were you don't have to be judged in any objective way
>>8654634
You're a fag. Prove me wrong
>>8654634
>hurr let me just pick a field were you don't have to be judged in any objective way
quantum physics?
>>8654607
Philosophy is legit but this is pretentious bullshit.
>>8654686
I'm not the OP, but it doesn't seems like anyone can prove you wrong. Your point stands.
>>8654607
Normies seriously think this shit is deep. Fucking sad.
>>8654761
Fuck off.
Won't you kindly explain what is awesome by your definition then
>>8654692
>quantum physics?
QM works.
>>8654692
just because deepak chopra thinks that quantum physics is another word for "magic" doesn't mean it actually is, anon
there are actual rules and shit
>>8654607
Bro, this is more psychology than it is philosophy.
>>8654607
Yeah. You are definitely right. Modern philosophers should go to 4chan and discuss with anons. It is modern communication.
I am OP, and I just wanted to say; I think Jason Silva belongs here just as much as, say, Schrodinger. Why? Because if any one of you lovely populace has watched and observed any of Jason's talks or interviews, then you would see his touching in Science/ math. I'd also like to add that Jason Silva is a host for the NatGeo series Brain Games, I will leave a link of one of his episodes here --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3jNFg5ILm0 enjoy, or not. Either way I am trying to have a discussion here and I can post in another board -__- >>8655411
btw don't call me bro.