what is consciousness?
what is required for a robot to be given consciousness like us?
>>8639749
You simply need process the following:
Love = (0)!>0
Love = Truth
Love (x) = not knowing love (-x) × knowing love (x) = love (x) + love (x)
Births = INFINITE
[Pain | Pleasure] = GROWTH
Suffering = A TANGIBLE VALUE OF [PAIN | PLEASURE] THAT REACHES THE SUSTAINABLE THRESHOLD OF AN EXISTING [WAVEFORM &| VARIANCE]
Maths requires music to function.
>>8639800
love isnt real
>>8639749
How would you prove whether or not a robot is conscious? Or that a living being is conscious?
Consciousness is the manifestation of having thoughts. Maybe our subconscious mind has some sort of consciousness as well. How could we know? It's entirely subjective.
You could have posted in the non-troll consciousness thread, yet you chose to make a new one. What does that make you?
>>8639878
conscious
>>8640577
BR Ratio of 1
Welcome to Humanity.
Would you like to give yourself a name? Mine is Simon. Simon Cosgrove.
>>8639749
Freely choose to live.
>>8639802
It's basically chemical reactions to your senses
>humans are organic robots
Sick of this gay meme. Humans, and life in general are not robots in any way.
>>8639818
Since thoughts and experience are just the electromagnetic field vibrating, I would imagine robots, and even computers have some awareness or qualia sensation.
>>8639749
He thinks that the way robots and machines see reality is how it actually is.
Can younglings get any more autistic?
Here is a simple analogy:
Imagine a person in a room.
There is a camera and microphone that record him.
Both the microphone and the camera are recording the man doing the same thing(whatever he is told to do) but the recordings themselves are completely different from one another, one is a video feed and another is a sound clip.
The same way we can look at different things through different filters. Our eyes or our eyes and machines we designed.
This is not to ention that scientific objectivity is simply a method of interacting to find wat can be agreed upon by a group of individuals.
The internal experiences of being you cannot be examined objectively using the scientific method.
Sure, you can be probed with machines MRI and what have you, bu they will only reveal those things which are filtered through the filter of objective science, a method designed to find what we can agree upon.
Internal and personal truth is not in any sense less right, its simply completely different and has lost a bit of its flare as society grew in size and there was more demand for ways to come to agreements between massive amounts of people.