So, is this because of "climate change" too?

>>8631062
You mean like from the toilet?

>>8631062
one sallow does not make a summer

wasn't 2014 a drought year for cali

>>8631073
Several years actually. We were supposed to be doomed. Lots of attention when it was drought, due to "climate change" of course. Zero attention now that it's good, not due to "climate change" of course.

File: 2017-ofa.jpg (47KB, 541x362px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 541x362px

climate always changes
after dry comes wet
after warm comes cold
like day after night

It's called a drought and it was abnormally long.

And they said Trump being elected would fuck up the planet. Even the worst state of the US is getting better.

File: huh.gif (583KB, 500x275px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 500x275px

>>8631160

abnormal? The man made "climate change" was especially bad between 1928-1937...

Historic droughts
Since 1900, the following dry years have had significantly below-average precipitation.

1917–21
1922–26
1928–37
1943–51
1959–62
1976–77
1987–92
2007–09
2012–16

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droughts_in_California

>it rained in California in January
>that means global warming doesn't real

Ah, the simple logic of a Trump cultist.

hey at least if there's more water in the system we won't have so many droughts right?

the field of climate change projects an increase in global average temperature

that does not mean some areas may not see a decrease in temperature or an increase in precipitation

>>8631062
>1 set of data from 1 place is enough to disprove climate change

>doctors said my kid has lung cancer but he can still breath therefore he doesn't have lung cancer
>doctors said my kid has lung cancer but he didn't cough today therefore he doesn't have lung cancer

>>8631215
>that means global warming doesn't real

How exactly am I supposed to respond to that? I guess I'll respond to this instead.

>it rained in California in January

Please look again Anon, do you see the snow pack? It's the majority of the white stuff in the picture. And, yes the rains have come as well. That's usually how droughts end.
Droughts like the multiple California droughts I posted in >>8631200.

>>8631232
The keyword is "projects"...the reality is something very different.
When will science stop basing itself in fantasy, and get back to reality again?

>>8631062
Drought versus no drought

File: climate thread simulator.png (168KB, 792x633px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 792x633px

>>8631062
>>8631263
>>8631135
>>8631187
ur fagets

>>8631351
go back to >>>/pol/

>>8631062
Climate energizing (change, warming) produces weather extremes. If you're boasting of one year of snow pack maybe you want to hold off a few years. You likely believe everything is going back to normal, that irreparable damage has not been done. If it is not too little water, it will be too much water. It'll likely be too little.

>>8631351
no u

>>8631351
/thread

>>8631351
saved so hard

>>8631062
I'm in Texas and this winter has been crazy warm even for here. Checkmate atheists.

>>8631081
>One decent year makes everything go away
It will take several years for it to matter

>>8631263
>look guise a month was different from the trend so the trend isn't real!
You are an idiot.

>>8631062
First pic was El Nino year

>>8631257
Not sure about California but snowpack in the Rockies is below average this year, even though it's been a cold and snowy winter relative to the last couple decades.

>eutrophication
>positive
wew

File: e7615b078e54394d49b0bf6ddf3a1685.jpg (52KB, 580x282px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 580x282px

Earth is a
rhombus pls
respond

>>8631351
Fucking gold

>>8631692
kek

File: 1432252491893.png (190KB, 540x386px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 540x386px

>>8631692
fucking kek