>>8628781
Easy ><
>>8628786
I agree with this anon, it's 6, ><
Exclude 1-3 because there is at least one square with only 2 symbols in every sequence.
All the combinations are also different, so I am excluding 7 and 5 ad well.
It's a bit difficult to explain, but consider only the 2nd and 3rd symbol when there are 4 in the same square: in <><> for instance, only consider the central ><.
Look at them vertically and you can notice that in the same row, there are always 2 similiar and one different.
With this logic, I can exclude 4 and I am left with 6, so ><
>>8628968
Wow when I apply this to what they did at CERN i get this
Signed rivercoon and skyserb
>>8628987
Wut?
>>8628988
Light reflects because of energy off mass and bends/rotates around it.
>>8628993
What you see is a projection from the reflexion of that light into your eyes
>>8628993
What has that to do with how I think you can solve OP's logic quiz?
>>8628998
What is between >?< ?
> the centre of ><=?
What is between -1<¿>1
> -0.0 or . = 0?
>>8628781
is it the 6th one?
>>8628781
It's >> because it's a fucking diagonal sequence.
Fucking brainlets I swear.
>>8628781
The first one.
>>8629807
explain
>>8628781
>> not >< like some are saying here
>>8630313
That was not supposed to be greentexted
>>8629807
ofc it's >>
>>8628781
So, is it >< or >> ?
>>8630973
>_< ugh i don't know XD
>>8630983
We have 2 different answers in this thread, how can we decide which thinking was the correct one?
>>8631004
by answering another logic question.
>>8628781
this one is a little easier...
>>8631004
>>8631104
My logic in this is how the fuck do arrows and random numbers in diamonds divided by smaller diamonds with numbers have anything to do with logic?
>>8631104
I could put any fucking number in there and say it's logic someone elaborate on how this has anything to do with logic.
>>8631158
No one is even going to comment on how I'm a newfag and a brain let wtf ?
>>8628781
I got
>><
Difficult at first but took me no longer than 3 minutes
>>8631322
Fuck. Now I can see the logic behind >> as well. My guess is there's numerous answers.
>>8630983
><'' goddab puzzle !!
>>8631104
2
>>8628781
Jesus Christ, I finally fucking got it.
It's a diagonal sequence.
>>8631161
the top and bottom number multiplied together are written with the two horizontal numbers. This one was much more reasonable than the op because I can't see multiple answers.
>>8631471
still not seeing the logic desu
>>8631477
One second, i'll make it more detailed
>>8628781
>most intelligent way to solve it:
>push the buttons sequentially until you push the right one
>>8631483
>>8628781
this is probably the wrong way it works but if you line them up vertically (all rectangles with two arrows in the same line, which also lines up all the ones with three arrows pointing in one direction and all the ones with two arrows pointing in both directions) you get this pattern.
the dot denotes that it's the same two arrows moving in the same fashion across all three columns, the slash and the loop denote that it's the same arrows moving in a similar fashion but when they reach the middle row the flip (signified by the loop)
anyway my answer is ><
>>8632932
forgot pic
>>8633350
are you memeing
>>8628781
">>" is my answer after carefully examining it for 20 seconds.
all of the choices are fine. there an infinite number of meanings those character could represent. You either guess what the creator was thinking or you don't. Prove me wrong.
8631104