Kristen Stewart wrote a research paper on AI

>>8625129
>wrote a research paper
I think you meant
>consented to have her name printed on a research paper
She gets to look like a smart person, and the actual smart people get some free publicity. She's a parasite, but its a symbiotic relationship.

>>8625129
Only in her capacity as a director

>>8625129
>three page """paper"""
fucking what

>>8625129
She's a pale qt3.[irrational digits] though.

She would look ugly as fuck if she ever got a tan

File: qt.jpg (95KB, 498x750px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 498x750px

>>8625245
nah shes still cute

>>8625251
>ULTRA MEGA GIGA RARE KRISTEN

Damn son.

>>8625129
>wrote
>research

>what is authorship order
Bhautik Joshi looks to be the principal author.

>>8625251
less cute though

needs more background info on "neural style transfer". since it's only three pages, there's plenty of room for an overview.

>>8625917
probably all locked behind NDAs seeing as the first author was an Adobe dev.

>>8625922

the first sentence of the intro cites a paper on image style transfer, they could at least go over that.

>>8625926
Why would you summarize something that you just cited? That's not how you write papers.

>>8625929

because that's the method they are applying in the paper, and the paper itself does not provide many technical details. it would improve readability. even if you're familiar with that research field, you wouldn't know what "image style transfer" is unless you've already read that paper. at least they should give readers the gist of what they're doing. the paper is short, so there's plenty of room for that.

>>8625129

Few hours ago I wrote a research of intestinal transit.
By literally pulling a sheet between my cheeks.
1000x more intellectual contribution than hers.

>>8627224
you're salty your name isn't on a paper

>>8627231

You. You Stronk !

>>8625129
does she hardly ever wash her hands or her hair

>>8625244
>implying length of the paper determines the quality
Nigger.

>>8625129
>posting 3DPD
>/r9k/

It's not even three pages, it's like 2.5 pages... with pictures.

>>8627290
three page paper is literally the abstract and references.

>>8625129
This gimmick annoys me, Pajeet.

Haha. She will not publish it in any serious journal. It is rubbish.

>>8625129
the idea's cool but it's more deserving of a blog post than a research paper

>>8627385
This, though I'm not buttblasted about it being on Arxiv. Also, it makes sense that she's a coauthor even though she probably didn't contribute any technical work because she was making the creative decisions over which the creative work was made.

I'm glad that the gimmick may help normalize machine learning in the eyes of the public.

>>8625129
It's a cute idea, like a blog post made in a very pompous way :)

Pff. You talk ill of it, yet it is more than you ever achieve. The movie is poetic and this paper is great and explains well the science behind the film.

>>8627337
>>8625244
so where's your paper?