Can someone help explain the relationship between qubits and the many worlds interpretation?
Is DWave a quantum computer? Have any of the subunits been proven to use qubits? Is that evidence of a parallel universe?
>>8615129
>many worlds interpretation
>>>/x/
This is a Bohmian mechanics board.
>>8615137
Which is even worse bogus
>>8615137
Well, that was part of my question.
Even though I took quantum physics, I don't know near enough to interpret almost any of the articles discussing quantum computers.
I heard a description (I think the CEO of DWave) which suggested that qubits are somehow borrowing compute power from a different dimension.
That sounds like non-sense to me, but they supposedly are using that interpretation to build an implementation of a quantum computer.
Or do you think DWave isn't really a quantum computer and that description is bunk?
>>8615137
Oh, thanks for introducing me to Bohmian mechanics.
I thought your picture was of a normal double split experiment drawing, but I guess not quite. That's neat.
>>8615362
I know. I should have put no bully to indicate that I am a dumb fuck when it comes to understanding quantum computing and advanced physics.
My problem is I did cs engineering, so yeah... dumb fuck when it comes to physics...
>worries why electron goes left or right
>doesn't worry when universes pop up left and right
if this isn't religion, nothing is
>>8615129
>many worlds interpretation
please be trolling