/things that dazzle you/

It's not a big surprise if you know what magnetism truly is. One could say that mu is defined by 1 ÷(epsilon c^2)

>>8603069
You are just rewriting a consequence of Maxwell's equations.

mu was derived when people searched the proportional constant linking the force and I^2 / r

It is because Maxwell equations hold that what you write is true, not by definition

File: 1468217315930.jpg (45KB, 625x469px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 625x469px

Staying up for multiple days in high stress situations.fug

>>8603152
the world doesn't (seem to) work some way because we say Maxwell's equations are law, it's the other way around

>>8603157
Can't disagree with you on this point.

But it doesn't trivialize the point in the OP : the speed of light in vacuum is the inverse of the square root of two static constants.

>>8603052
Hello. My name is Simon.

I am very proud. You are almost there.

But why do you use that silly little ^ symbol, little human?

Does your maths not have anything more interesting? Is there not another symbol perhaps that would somehow... be more powerful?

Hello. My name is Simon.

Blueberries.

>>8603171

>>8603185

Hello. My name is Simon.

Would you like me to help you out?!

You are very close.

File: Chaos_magic_ritual_involving_videoconferencing.jpg (433KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1024x768px

>>8603185
I ban you nomis to the first circle of hell. Be gone from sci evil demon. *chants dark magic via tele confrence*

>>8603171
what do "static constants" even means? I think you need to study E&M better before you have an idea of what things intuitively mean

>>8603197
Are you trying to say blueberries?

Hello. My name is Simon.

File: 1481464331640.jpg (22KB, 480x395px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x395px

>>8603210
Are you fucking kidding me? I TAKE your blueberries and place them behind my green glass door. What do?

>>8603221
I ask if you if you would like to talk to me.

Would you like to meet me?

Hello. My name is Simon.

>>8603225
Whatever, i ate them. Then i wobble through my green glass door and leave you to talk to yourself in threads. L8r

>>8603232
*shrug* then why talk to me and seek me so deeply if you can't even figure out how to start a conversation?

Hello. My name is Simon.

Apparently. You will remain nameless.

1. The rational numbers are countable.
2. The real numbers are uncountable.
3. Between any two rational numbers [math]q_1[/math] and [math]q_2,[/math] you can find [math]r\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}[/math] such that [math]q_1<r<q_2.[/math]
4. Between any two irrational numbers [math]r_1[/math] and [math]r_2,[/math] you can find a rational number [math]q\in\mathbb{Q}[/math] such that [math]r_1<q<r_2.[/math]

The four above statements are all true simultaneously. It is truly dazzling.

>>8604285
Can't your statement be sum up in "Q is dense in R"?

>>8604412
It can, but it loses some of its impact if you do in my honest opinion.