Is Bill Nye "our guy", /sci/?
>>8601092
No. Tom Hanks is.
that's not von neumann
>>8601092
In the sense that he's a libtard memer with no background in science?
Sounds about right
>>8601115
>no background in science?
Well... a background in mechanical engineering. That means at least a little physics. So not *no* background. But not enough to elevate him to "our guy.'
>>8602616
>Bachelor's in engineering
>Even the slightest hint of a scientist
Pick one and only one my good friend
>>8602616
>a bachelors in mechanical engineering
he may have gotten his degree from MIT, but the fact remains that there are quite a few people on /sci/ who can claim they are more educated than Bill.
motherfucker doesn't even have his PE for christ sakes.
>>8601092
No he's the"science guy"