The Future is Wild

>>8597389
Very accurate The future of mathematics is very, very Wild.

>>8597389
Very accurate. Monkey-squids and brotosaur turtles, sign my ass up!

>>8597391
The future of mathematics is Wildberger, you mean.

>>8597389
No idea, because the future hasn't happened yet

>>8597389
Damn I loved this show, but probably not too accurate.
Giant spider colonies that make huge webs to catch grain that feeds their livestock seems super reasonable.

>>8597389
its already the future and things are not very wild, just shitty

File: 17m2af8plt4egjpg.jpg (5KB, 198x179px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 198x179px

>>8597389
Was it ever billed as an "accurate" depiction?

>>8598925
Was considered "plausible" by those involved:
R McNeill Alexander, zoologist
Leticia Aviles, evolutionary biologist
Phillip Currie, paleontologist and paleoornithologist
Dougal Dixon, geologist
Richard Fortey, paleontologist
William Gilly, cell biologist, developmental biologist and marine biologist
Stephen Harris, mammalogist
Kurt Kotrschal, zoologist
Mike Linley, herpetologist
Roy Livermore, palaeogeographer
R. McNeill Alexander, specialist in biomechanics
Karl J. Niklas, botanist
Stephen Palumbi, marine biologist
Jeremy Rayner, zoologist
Robert Stephen John Sparks, geologist
Bruce H. Tiffney, palaeobotanist
Paul Valdes, paleoclimatologist

Its not accurate and they never intended it to be. They just wanted an excuse to animate squid-monkeys.

>>8599127

It is plausible. But that's not accuracy.