If wormhole theoretially allow time travel

wormholes don't exist man, they might exist in theory

>>8595662
One thing I can guarantee: No one on this board knows. Period.

>>8595662
No. There is no consistent theory in physics that allows for time travel back in time.

>>8595666
I would be inclined to believe you, except you're Satan.

>>8595716
It's on the same level as string theory. Nobody but people who calculate something in it understand or even care about it.
For majority of people it's all a waste of time and not physics.

>>8595730
A wormhole can be time-locked, though. And by can, I mean in theory of course.

Setting up one end of a traversible wormhole at point X time Z1 and the other at Y Z2 should allow you go to back in time if you enter on side Y and exit on side X

But you will never be able to go any earlier in time than when point X was activated.

I'd more inclined to believe that wormholes act like amber does for fossils, and preserves the state of your matter in a fixed point while the rest of space time continues to change around you as it does outside of the wormhole. Aka, it only shoots you into the future, not into the past.

File: IMG-20160503-WA0002.jpg (33KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 657x527px

>>8595762
Please, share your knowledge, even in mathematical functions.

>>8595762
>It's on the same level as string theory.

No it isn't. String Theory is a self-consistent theory of physics. No theories of time travel are.

>>8595769
this probably wouldn't work
sending objects back in time fucks with entropy