Books on rhetoric/how to argue for autismos?
>>8591359
>arguing
You fight back, physically. Sticks and stones will break their bones but words will never hurt them.
>>8591359
Mildy obscure, but found it a great read: https://www.amazon.com/Winning-Debates-Steven-Lee-Johnson/dp/1932716513
Also check out how to win friends and influence people, more of a classic.
>>8591359
Every time your opponent says something (anything), reply: "Not an argument", if they ask how it is not an argument, think of a random number between 1 and 30, call it 'x', go to this website:
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html
Select the xth fallacy there, and then say, "I'm sorry but you've completed <insert fallacy here>".
bump.
how do you get your point across in an elegant way?
>>8593104
I'll take some more of those pics for one.
But /sci/ autists would do well to read (actual) political debate in which each side claims the evidence is in their favor. There is no "Oh, I see the flaw in this proof so I accept your correction". It's all just rhetoric and argumentative techniques. Just don't start believing the idology.
Now the pics.