[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Supersymmetry

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 2

File: Susy-particles.jpg (67KB, 579x333px) Image search: [Google]
Susy-particles.jpg
67KB, 579x333px
What stops us from being able to see SUSY particles if we are able to see standard particles just fine?

As far as my understanding goes we are completely able to see standard particles. What is stopping us from seeing SUSY particles (being that they do exist?)? Is it an equation we have yet to discover? Or am I just completely misunderstanding Supersymmetry?
>>
>>8591182
The only possible SUSY models that are left are high energy SUSY models. i.e. The SUSY isn't noticeable until you reach high energies

Such energies are not yet reachable by the LHC and thus can not yet be tested experimentally.
>>
>>8591189 How much energy is exactly needed to do that?
>>
File: JEaXji.png (17KB, 517x284px) Image search: [Google]
JEaXji.png
17KB, 517x284px
Well you see its rather quite elementary. THe standard particles actually exist but SUSY is just an idea someone came up with and those particles don't exist.
>>
>>8591210
Say for a second that the idea of SUSY is correct. At that point all we need is enough energy to prove it, correct?
>>
>>8591206
Depends on what model, and in what theory, you are working.


The thing about supersymmetry, is we have no idea what model is right and thus have a lot of them.
>>
>>8591229
What are some models/theories I can study thus more?
I'm not working on any specific model/theory at the moment, more or less just self educating.
>>
>>8591256
Here is a short paper discussing the phenomenology of the "Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model " and the
"Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model".

https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6420
>>
>>8591287
Much appreciated!
>>
>>8591206
about 3 energies
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 2


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.