Chernobyl

>>8582195
Not very with all those of those mutants...

The radiation exposure is a time-dependent metric. You can visit the city and be fine. But I believe it's still unable to be inhabited for long-term stays.

Is there a way to clean away most of the radiation?

>>8582195
You can tour it with a guide, who carries a geiger counter.

So yeah, not very safe.

>>8582268

But are we talking hazardous doses or just above average?

been there. It's pretty safe. Liquidators have disposed of pretty much the radioactive material, there's still a few hotspots but they're marked, and if you go with a tour guide you'll avoid spending time near them.

Some people live there, mostly the elderly were allowed to go back to the evacuated area after a few years. Not in the closest radius but in the outer evacuated area.

You have to travel to Kiev, and then the tour busses leave from central station. Our tourguy was a total bro

>>8582258
Oxyclean gets the tough strains out

Granite buildings and radon cellars have highier radiation level than most of the zone

>>8582270
Some areas are hazardous, but mostly you'll find areas just high in radiation. Since the tour guides live there, they have to make sure they don't exceed 80-100 rads per day, or 3.5 millisiverts. While it's usually okay to receive some radiation, repeatedly going to an area and getting your daily dose of 3.5 millisiverts will obviously cause health issues, as 3.65 millisiverts is the normal yearly dose.
But yes, there are indeed hazardous areas where you could get ARS, but you'd have to be an absolute idiot to get yourself in those areas.

>>8582195
I always want to go and visit Chernobyl!
It's safe as long as you don't live there and you are just are a tourist.