IQTestDK & Raven's Progressive Matrices

>>8565713
It's a meme tier test that is used to detect retarded neckbeard virgin. If you dont get 120 on it you're a retard.

>>8565713

It's the most accurate and least culturally-dependant of all IQ tests. If you tend to score higher on verbal than on the abstract parts, this means you are over-educated for your level of intelligence. The abstract parts are the measure of your raw brainpower.

>>8565719

Will doing more and more of these types of problems increase my score artificially?

>>8565756
>Will doing more and more of these types of problems increase my score artificially?
Yes, which is why everyone here thinks that IQ tests are bullshit.

The real IQ test with the most accurate score is life. Discover something new and no one would be able to deny that you're intelligent

File: Q6.png (63KB, 998x546px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 998x546px

Can anyone provide a solution for this?
With explanation.

>>8565899
a, proof is trivial

>>8565713
I scored 130 using half the time allotted

>>8565719
I have a verbal "IQ" of 120 and a pattern-based of 108, but that's pretty fucking terrible if you're not wrong that it could mean I am over-educated for my level of intelligence.

>>8565769
>>8565756

No, you can't get better at the g-loaded parts of the matrices by practise. You can get better at culturally dependant parts like the verbal tests, but your raw g is innate, nothing much you can do to increase it.

>>8566514

There's more to life than being smart.

File: myiq.png (78KB, 616x542px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 616x542px

huh

File: Screen Shot 2016-11-03 at 9.37.39 PM.png (834KB, 2576x1792px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 2576x1792px

t. brainlet

>>8565899
A

The column in which the same two shapes alternates each time. In addition, the shape which is being repeated changes each time.

File: .jpg (93KB, 1122x841px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1122x841px

Regarding the "growth mindset" as it relates to IQ, is it true in the sense that anyone CAN learn anything, given enough time, or is there a conceptual ceiling to be hit at some point?

>>8566553
>>8566612
>never even seen anyone score below 130 in this
>test if its bullshit
>95 IQ by choosing randomly
amazing IQ test

>>8567812
I've seen several people on /pol/ score in the low 100s. Also >>8566612 replicates my other scores I've taken on other tests.

>>8566553
>>8566612
answer are on youtube you ruin the test

File: Screen Shot 2016-12-28 at 8.39.44 PM.png (20KB, 300x270px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x270px

kek

File: reasoning index idk.png (75KB, 546x638px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 546x638px

https://www.cerebrals.org/jcti/JCTI_rev2013.swf

>>8568138
Not surprised that /pol/s performance is just slightly above random choosing.