Constructive Criticism

>>8563094
It needs more books, more books means more knowledge, more knowledge means more power.

The chemistry listing is so crappy. Who the fuck would recommend Griffiths for quantum mechanics unless you're an actual physics student?

>>8563107

It's an intro level quantum book, why not?

>>8563094
That it sucks? Does anyone actually go to this and read it? It's been a sticky for years but nobody here actually talks math or science so what's the point?

>>8563104

But they don't want you to be informed.

there is a ton of links in some pages, newcomers would be confused

>>8563338
>(((they)))

It's pretty shitty IMO

>>8563137
i go there for textbooks :/

>>8564326
Are you referring to the sticky or the wikia?

File: ((Education)).png (176KB, 640x3030px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 640x3030px

>>8563338
>(((they)))

>>8563107
I agree, Atkin's molecular quantum mechanics or physical chemistry would be a more specific reading for chemists interested on qm before they go to full course (griffiths, feynman, etc)

>>8565553
McQuarrie or Levine are just as good as Atkin's text.

>>8564417
That's what it's for.

>>8563094
i took a quick look, and it seems its missing some abstract algebra

>>8569966
>and it seems its missing some abstract algebra

There's high school, undergrad, and 1st year graduate Abstract Algebra.

>>8563104
How many Lambourghinis do you have OP?