well? possible?

>>8560694
man that's dumb. fuck rogue one

>>8560694
>is applying force over time to an object going to alter its trajectory?

Gee op i dunno

File: spaceships.jpg (106KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x720px

>>8560694
That'll teach them for breaking regulation and flying two 1.6 km long ships 100 m apart.

Every "scifi" movie is retarded, OP. So, don't even bother posting again.

>>8560694
>well?
No.
>possible?
No.

>>8560694
Star Wars is not hard sci-fi you faggot, their ships fly using "anti-gravity" according to Lucas, they're not actually even in orbit.

Asking if a scene from Star Wars is plausible is retarded, just like Black Science Man

/tv/ had a better discussion than this about said topic

>>8560752
Any discussion of this is worse than no discussion.

See >>8560749

>>8560694
I'm 99% sure that an Imperial Star Destroyer has heavier armor plating than some Rebel frigate tier ship.

When the first impact happens the Rebel ship probably should have shattered. Assuming it made it through the first impact, when the impact of the first star destroyer on the second star destroyer happened the sudden jerk should have ALSO caused catastrophic damage to the Rebel Frigate while once again leaving the Star Destroyer unharmed.

The momentum's involved in this should have especially caused instant flattening once the first star destroyer impacted the second.

>Is it feasible to push a ship into another from the side
Obviously possible, that parts fine. It's more the "lol our small rebellion tier funded ship can survive a crash that the most advanced and heavily armored and armed warship in the galaxy can't" urks me a bit.