Well?

>>8546168
ur mum

The lava sun would solidify and the ice sun would melt and evaporate, leaving a big sun made of solid rock.

>>8546171
would the rock be valuable

>>8546171
Actually the ice sun would become a normal sun since the water in the interior is at an incredible pressure thus starting fusing the hydrogen.

File: 1476133368531.jpg (80KB, 553x567px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 553x567px

>>8546177
I wonder if it would make some pretty sweet looking igneous rocks

define the temperatures OP

>>8546177
Probably not. I mean, it's just molten rock: i.e. lava.
>>8546181
But it's not hydrogen. It's dihydrogenmonoxide. Big difference.

File: XScLtMb.jpg (182KB, 1241x208px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1241x208px

>>8546188
OP left out the best part.
>-1000°C

>>8546168
A "sun" (star) is defined as having fission and fusion reactions.

A non-orbiting celestial body made of lava would technically be an asteroid. And would have long, long ago cooled to solid rock.

So, what would be the result if a large asteroid made of rock crashed into a large asteroid made of ice?

A mess.

>>8546198
i know there's absolute zero but what the fuck would -1000° feel like should you be impervious to harm

would it even be perceptible

>>8546632
Sometimes a sentence is so incomprehensible, all the words in it completely lose their meanings.

>>8546632
What you're trying to imagine is impossible for a reason. Temperate is (in laymen's terms) how "active" a particle is, with absolute zero being it standing still. You can't just make up a "negative stillness" the particle can be at.

>>8546640
is english your 4th language
>>8546642
so it'd be the same as absolute zero then

>>8546632
The temperature actually scale wraps around at infinity, so -1000° would be ridiculously hot.

>old, asinine troll garbage
any user-base worth a shit would report,
any janitor worth a shit would delete.