Are you smarter than a Nip?
Fuck off
>>8541896
-1/12
>>8541896
9.0
>>8541896
9.0
>>8541896
8.999999...
>>8541896
9.0 +/- 0.05, as we don't know the precision on the numbers.
>>8541919
>precision on the numbers
That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.
So it should be 9.3 +/- 0.3
>>8541896
its ten you fucking retards, round the decimals 6+ 4 ya goofs
>>8541896
Do any Japs here know the answer?
-1.0/12
32
>>8541902
I know what you did there
>>8541993
3*9 + 5*1
>>8542003
drop out
>>8542002
>not using dot for multiplication and comma for decimals
>>8542003
mathematician
3.9 + 5.1 = there is an unique solution and it's trivial
>>8541896
Depends. In what group are we and what do the symbols '3.1' and '5.9' mean in terms of the elements of that group? Also, what is the explicit definition of the operation '+' for this group?
>>8541896
a white man spitting on a black man
>>8541963
Even if they did theres only 1% chance they will be right.
>>8542013
>further proof will be left as an excercise for the reader
>>8542033
/thread
>>8542003
memelord
9.00000000001
>>8541896
Why you shouldn't build a reactor on the japanese coastline.
>>8541933
>That 1 in 5.1 could be an imprecisely drawn 7. There's no way to be 100% certain which number it is.
found the ''grades arent important Im wise in a way that cannot be measured'' guy
>>8541933
That's not how that works
>>8541896
obviously the answer is ???
>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = ??? = 3?
? = (3.9 + 5.1)/3 = 3
>>8542906
>??? = 3?
>not ?^3
shigeridoo
>>8541896
>Are you smarter than a Nip?
Nein
>>8541896
Who the fuck cares lol
Only nerds work with numbers and care about precision in their crunching
>>8541896
As we lack definitions for any of the symbols/groups of symbols in the picture, particularly the three question marks, we cannot deduce anything.
q.e.d.
>99% of jap school children are not autists
Pretty reassuring, actchually.
Hard to believe unless schoolchildren is defined as being quite young.
>>8541896
easy
just consider 3.9 as 4-0.0999... and 5.1 as 5.0999....
and then triple integrate
>>8541919
9.0+/-0.1 you fucking brainlet
>>8541896
8.1
>>8541896
? = 3
Q.E.D
>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
3? = 9
? = 3
>>8545664
3.9 + 5.1 = ???
??? = 9
?^3 = 9
? = 2.08
>>8541896
It's 9, japanese children are just complete idiots, that's why there are only 1 % who are right.
>>8545666
lel
>>8545666
this guy fucks
>>8541919
9.0 implies [math]\pm[/math] 0.05.
>>8542003
quality post, kekked out loud
>>8541896
? = 3
>>8542003
dats it mang
3.9十5.1
(3.9)(十)(5.1)
十 is japanese for 10
(3.9)(10)(5.1)
193.9 is the correct answer
it's 11
t. asian chemist
>>8541896
10.
t. Engineer
>>8542003
>philosopher
>woman studies
got a laugh out of me
it's 9 considering the precision is implied to be two significant figures if there are no zeroes ahead of them.
>>>8545666
checked and keked
>>8548561
There are quantum digits after the first decimal points you just can't see them like in real life
>>8548561
reverse image search gives me nothing, sauce?
>>8541896
3.9 + 5.1 = 8.10
>>8541896
Assuming the equality sign is a test for equality (e.g. in Pascal)
> 3.5 + 5.1 = ???
Compilation error. Symbol ??? not found.
>>8549000
3.5 => 3.9
>>8541896
109.1 including dark numerals and dark operands.
>>8541896
my calculator it says 9 so...
What the fuck is going on, is /sci/ just pretending to be retarded?
9.0 +/- 0.1
>>8541896
Ive got $5.1
Ive got $3.9
How much do i have all together?
Fuck if i know because you dont show the full amount, ya cunt
9.000000000018284827e738wi4747