/sci/ BTFO

>>8541563
I can't believe I fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

>>8541563
I can't believe I fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

>>8541563
That's kind of hilarious if it's real.

>>8541563
I can't believe I fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

>>8541563
>Infowars

I know you aren't supposed to attack the source of the information, but come on.

File: 15420908_10154239596206733_78735819909664064_n.jpg (93KB, 960x742px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 960x742px

>>8541874
you're so right anon geeze

>>8541563
I can't believe I fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

>>8541988
>"W-what do you mean you don't like smelling Alex Jones's farts?"
>"I-I bet you would rather listen to [some other shitty news source]!"

Come on, dude.

>infowars

>>8541563
>Taking the British Alex Jones seriously

Kekekeke

>>8541563
I can't believe I fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

File: 1355316197943.jpg (80KB, 350x335px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 350x335px

>>8541563
>Infowars
>Monckton
>Announcing your results BEFORE being published
8/10 had a hearty chuckle

>>8541563
didn't see any boobies

>>8541563
THIS NEEDS TO BE SEEN BY EVERYBODY

sure it's real but the causation isn't human lmfao

>>8541988
>Huf post that high
Lmao

>>8541988
>Vox
>great in depth source of news
Saved this pic just so I could put it in the trash

>>8541563
HAHAHAHAHA, /sci/ BTFO once again.

>>8541988
The GUARDIAN
ACK ACK ACK ACK hilarious

I cant believe i fell for this hoax, but i can say I never felt confident about this "global warming" thing.

File: 1481033744441.jpg (138KB, 600x700px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 600x700px

INBRED

>>8545101
No joke, his eyes are coming so far out of his face he looks like a gold fish.

Also:
>We sent in our paper for review to a very prestigious and rigorous journal
>We can't tell you which one though

Hahaha

File: 3de49f5656c69529f8ba89f7531fee1b.jpg (53KB, 485x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 485x480px

>>8541988
>HuffPo not in liberal utter garbage
>WashPo not skews liberal
>NYT not skews liberal
>CNN not hyper partisan liberal

Liberal made this image. Guaranteed.

>>8541988
>CNN
>minimal partisan bias

you tripping nigga

>>8546614
>>8546605
> infowars pill popper detected

>>8541988
>Clinton News Netowrk
>minimum partisan bias

>>8546701
> people are still talking about Clinton even though she lost
literally why?

Her opinions weren't even interesting like Bernie

>>8541988
Is this is what leftist actually believe?

>>8541563
What the... weird! You know, to be honest, I was a tiny bit skeptical about this whole "global warming is a hoax" thing before that happened. But now I really am a climate skeptic!

>>8546729
really gets the noggin joggin if I don't say so myself!

File: 1425794196588.gif (2MB, 320x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x200px

>>8541563
>Monckton

>>8541988
Whoever made this should make another except group them by who owns them

File: Monckton.jpg (34KB, 477x599px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 477x599px

>>8541563
>>8545101
>>8546591
>>8546768

>>8541988
>CNN in the middle
stopped reading

>>8546633
I don't even like those retards but if you think CNN is unbiased you need to reconsider what is unbiased. They spent all of the election period attacking Trump and barely pointing out the wrong things about Hillary. I personally think Reuters and the AP are a much better source of information.

>>8541988
Created by six demorats in a two room office, very credible. Please drown yourself.

>>8541563
Back to /pol/ with you!!!